P2P
Peer-to-peer networks are now liable for any illegal content shared by users

Supreme Court finds against file sharing

Champagne corks popping in Hollywood

Iain Thomson

The US Supreme Court has found against file-sharing software provider Grokster in a ruling that potentially leaves other peer-to-peer networks liable for any illegal content shared by users.

In the case of MGM et al versus Grokster et al the court ruled unanimously in favour of the studios, stating that Grokster, StreamCast Networks and others can be held liable for any illegally copied material on members' PCs if they encourage users to break copyright law. The lower courts will now decide the fate of the P2P companies.

Advertisement

"The record is replete with evidence that from the moment Grokster and StreamCast began to distribute their free software, each one clearly voiced the objective that recipients use it to download copyrighted works, and each took active steps to encourage infringement," said Justice Souter in his final report.

The proceedings hinged around the 1984 Sony versus Universal Studios case which focused on sales of video recorders. The court ruled at the time that, although video recorders can be used to commit piracy, that is not their primary use.

This ruling still stands and it is up to the lower courts to decide whether software providers are actively inducing users to break the law by providing P2P software which, like video recorders, can be used to violate copyright laws.

"This decision shows that the court is willing to look to substance over form," said Michael Graif, counsel at Chadbourne & Parke, an international law firm which was not involved in the case. 

"Although the Grokster service was technically capable of being used in a substantially non-infringing way, which was the standard laid down by the Court in the Sony case in 1984, the fact is that the Grokster service was being used substantially to infringe copyrights with the full knowledge of Grokster."

Meanwhile, the recording industry can continue to prosecute users of P2P software. The British Phonographic Industries has already signalled that it will continue to demand P2P users' details and levy fines against them.

"This decision will not kill P2P sharing," said Cory Doctorow, European affairs co-ordinator at US pressure group the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

"Engineering students write P2P software in 11 lines of code as class assignments. The majority of internet users use file-sharing software, and that's not going to stop, no matter how many lawsuits against customers and companies the labels win."

  • Have your say
  • Send to a friend
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Share

Tags:

Do you agree?

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Most watched

Xperia X1

Video Review: Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

First Looks Editor Ian Williams gets hands on with the Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

IT white papers

Search white papers

Top categories

Poll

Poll: Summer smartphones

Poll: Summer smartphones

Which smartphone will you be taking to the beach this summer?

View poll results

Advertisement

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Spotlight

a padlock

Microsoft to plug security holes

Microsoft has given advance warning of a number of security...

Nokia handset

Top 10 articles, 10 July 09

No Nokia Android phone, ActiveX attacks and Google enters into...

Can Google beat Microsoft at its own game?

Google's announcement this week that it plans to step into...

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

Primary Navigation