The London School of
Economics (LSE) has estimated that the government's controversial
identity card scheme will cost more than twice as much as
initially thought.
The six-month study stated that the government's prediction that consumers
would pay £93 was "overly optimistic".
The report warned that costs could go as high as £230 per person, and that
the whole scheme could cost £19.2bn. It also said that potential technical
problems could drive the costs even higher.
"The report concludes that the establishment of a secure national identity
system has the potential to create significant, although limited, benefits for
society," said the LSE.
"However, the proposals currently being considered by Parliament are neither
safe nor appropriate.
"There was an overwhelming view expressed by stakeholders involved in this
report that the proposals are too complex, technically unsafe, overly
prescriptive and lack a foundation of public trust and confidence."
The report highlights deep concerns about the technology behind the cards,
calling it "untested and unreliable". Of particular concern is the use of
biometrics, which has never been used on such a scale.
As for the database behind the system, the report found that this would have
no effect on identity theft, and could even make the
problem worse by collecting all valuable data in one place.
It added that the proposed National Identity Register "may pose a far larger
risk to the safety and security of UK citizens than any of the problems it is
intended to address".
Richard Thomas, the UK's
Information
Commissioner, said: "I welcome the report commissioned and undertaken by the
LSE as a valuable contribution to an issue which engages significant data
protection and privacy concerns.
"I have expressed my unease that the current proposal to establish a national
identification system is founded on an extensive central register of personal
information controlled by government, and is disproportionate to the stated
objectives behind the introduction of ID cards.
"It raises substantial data protection concerns about the extent of the
information recorded about an individual when the ID card is used in their
day-to-day lives, and sparks fears about the potential for wider use/access to
this information in the future."
Privacy groups have been waging a campaign against the cards with an
online petition and the
creation of a fighting fund.
Tony Benn, three sitting MPs and the head of civil rights pressure group
Liberty
will be holding a
public
meeting to coincide with the second reading of the bill.
Doug Jewell, campaign co-ordinator for Liberty, said: "The government is
saying that it cannot release all its cost figures for commercial
confidentiality reasons; it's a nice thing to say.
"The government has a track record on large-scale IT projects; they cost a
lot more than was estimated and are a lot more complicated. There seems no
reason why this project should buck that trend."
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article