In the wake of SCO's controversial attempts to claim
ownership of key elements of the Linux operating system,
industry watchers have noted that senior IT executives are becoming much more
worried about open source intellectual property
indemnification.
According to a newly released IDC survey of 200 US-based IT professionals,
intellectual property indemnification is being seen as an IT management issue
rather than an open source issue.
The study predicts that effective intellectual property management will
become an increasingly important and differentiating issue for software vendors
over the next five years.
During this time end users will continue to push for standardisation,
education, clarity and consistency around vendor indemnification policies.
"End user organisations should be concerned about the potential cost and
disruption to their business if they need to replace a technology, the potential
distraction of management attention in defending the company against an
intellectual property infringement claim, and the potential effects on suppliers
entangled in intellectual property litigation," said Stephen Graham, group vice
president for IDC's Global Software Business Strategies.
Faced with the prospect of a legal battle, the analyst firm found that IT
executives are most concerned with the negative impact on software innovation
and the financial impact of replacing existing software.
Once a company is threatened with intellectual property infringement
litigation, costs are typically incurred to secure legal counsel, at which point
the company must weigh the potential risk to its IT investment and take
appropriate action.
Over 30 per cent of respondents participating in IDC's survey currently have
or are developing an indemnification policy.
IDC warned that the number and proportion of software
patents is rising dramatically as companies are motivated to acquire
patents, and in some cases use them as a competitive instrument.
Due to their greater resources, larger companies are likely to be the primary
targets for intellectual property indemnification lawsuits, and will be the
group to watch in regards to developing indemnification and management
approaches.
"IDC believes that addressing customer or partner solution development issues
is the most significant area for vendors to develop competitive advantage in
intellectual property indemnification," explained Graham.
"Our research shows that this issue is not just hype from media coverage
about recent indemnification litigation, but a concern deeply rooted in industry
issues that will continue to develop in the near future."
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article