Buyers face I/O dilemma on servers

IT managers to make tough decisions on compatibility, capabilities and cost

Martin Veitch

As well as picking the chips and operating systems they want, buyers of volume servers will next year have to choose between I/O architectures.

As a result, IT managers will have to make some tough decisions, taking into account backwards compatibility, new capabilities and cost.

Advertisement

AMD's 64bit Opteron processor is set to ship on 22 April. For volume server buyers, the choice of processors will have important implications. They will have to decide whether to stay with 32bit operating systems or exploit the power of Opteron and Intel's Itanium 2 with a 64bit version of Linux or the forthcoming 64bit version of Windows Server 2003.

Buyers must also choose between PCI-X and PCI Express bus architectures. Intel is pushing PCI Express - a faster, serial version of PCI that does not offer backwards compatibility - as the bus of choice for servers in the second half of next year.

However, some server makers plan to stay with a 2.0 update to the PCI-X bus standard that is widely deployed on servers today. PCI-X is a faster version of PCI that accepts older network, graphics and other peripheral cards.

An Intel spokesman said: "We expect quick adoption of PCI Express in servers and desktops next year. Most of our chipsets will have PCI Express support."

Dell plans to move directly from PCI-X to PCI Express next year. However, other server makers will not be so swift.

HP, the biggest seller of Intel-based servers in the UK, is unlikely to adopt PCI Express next year, instead plumping for PCI-X and a chipset from ServerWorks, the Broadcom subsidiary that also supports AMD chips.

"We're going to continue to support PCI-X in 2004," said Phil McLean, HP industry-standard product marketing manager.

"Customers invested heavily in NICs and Raid controllers and this gives them investment protection for several years. We're evaluating PCI Express but at the moment there are no [product] plans."

ServerWorks has predicted that PCI Express will not be successful at first because, it said, PCI Express is not significantly better than PCI-X.

Another major server maker, Fujitsu Siemens, uses PCI-X in its current Primergy line and is also wary of commiting itself to PCI Express.

"PCI Express is an interesting technology we consider for future deployment," said a spokesperson. "The big challenge is the availability of supported controllers and the compatibility with PCI-X cards."

  • Have your say
  • Send to a friend
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Share

Tags:

Do you agree?

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Most watched

Xperia X1

Video Review: Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

First Looks Editor Ian Williams gets hands on with the Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

IT white papers

Search white papers

Top categories

Poll

Poll: Summer smartphones

Poll: Summer smartphones

Which smartphone will you be taking to the beach this summer?

View poll results

Advertisement

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Spotlight

a padlock

Microsoft to plug security holes

Microsoft has given advance warning of a number of security...

Nokia handset

Top 10 articles, 10 July 09

No Nokia Android phone, ActiveX attacks and Google enters into...

Can Google beat Microsoft at its own game?

Google's announcement this week that it plans to step into...

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

Primary Navigation