Oracle has been hit with a $10,000 (£6,200) fine by the
Transaction
Processing Performance Council (TPC) over claims made by the firm about the
performance of Sun and Oracle servers.
A series of adverts entitled 'Sun + Oracle is Faster' appeared in The
Wall Street Journal and The Economist promising significant
improvements over the likes of IBM's Power 595 in a
TPC-C
benchmark.
The adverts and the associated Oracle web site, which has now been taken
offline, stated that Oracle would have definitive figures to back up the claims
on 14 October, but the lack of immediate proof sparked a complaint from IBM to
the TPC.
The TPC is behind all the reputable transaction processing and database
benchmarks, and stated that it has no record of any test which would verify the
claims made in the ads.
"The TPC requires that claims based on TPC benchmarks must be demonstrable
using publicly available data from official TPC benchmark results," said a TPC
spokesman.
In a
letter
to Oracle (PDF), the TPC said that the company had made "unsubstantiated
superior performance claims about an Oracle/Sun configuration relative to an
official TPC-C result from IBM".
As a result, the TPC ruled that the advertisement had violated its fair use
rules and imposed the fine. The TPC has also ordered Oracle to "take all steps
necessary to ensure that the ad will not be published again", and to remove the
contents of the related promotional web site.
Oracle is in the process of acquiring Sun Microsystems in a £5.1bn deal, but
the deal is being delayed by an
in-depth
investigation by European regulators.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article