Microsoft has come under fire for leaving a security flaw affecting Internet
Explorer unpatched for over a year, but the software giant has responded by
saying it had to ensure customers would not be adversely affected by any fix it
issued.
Earlier
this week, Microsoft issued a
Security
Advisory note stating it was investigating a reported vulnerability in its
Microsoft Video ActiveX Control.
It later emerged that the two researchers who discovered the flaw, Ryan Smith
and Alex Wheeler working at
IBM Internet Security
Systems, submitted an official report to Microsoft as early as spring 2008.
Microsoft said that an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability
in question could gain the same user rights as the local user if they are using
Internet Explorer, and execution may not require any action on the user's
behalf, unlike many other exploits that trick the user into running them.
In a
blog
posting, Mike Reavey, head of Microsoft's Security Response Center (MSRC),
said the company is working towards a security update, but that it decided to
issue workaround details to customers when it found attackers were beginning to
exploit the vulnerability.
"We were far enough in the process that we could provide information that
customers can use to protect themselves in the interim while we complete the
investigation and deliver a security update that you can deploy broadly with
confidence," Reavey said.
Microsoft engineers have decided the best approach to protect customers is to
disable the functionality targeted in the attack, as it claims there are was no
known uses for these interfaces in Internet Explorer, but this approach must be
taken with caution.
"When we disable or remove functionality, we have to engage in even more
research and testing than usual, to ensure that we can take this step and not
cause more harm than good by inadvertently 'breaking' applications," said
Reavey.
While Microsoft continues to work on the issue, customers can follow
instructions
here
to implement a workaround for the flaw.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article