We continue our investigation into what enterprise content management (ECM)
companies are doing to improve the technology, and whether they can actually
come good on their bold claims to help customers get to grips with the data
overload. You can read part one of our report
here.
Mike Lynch, chief executive, Autonomy
"The problem with legacy ECM is that you worked out what was important to
your organisation, moved it to a central repository, and then did a lot of
manual work on it - tagging it and so on. Then every time it changed, the system
made a record of it. So to say you were 'managing' your content is pushing it
really. The legacy model was also not ready for the explosion in unstructured
content – it's no longer a small subset of information. And fatally for the old
model, regulatory changes came. It used to be that they'd ask you to produce a
small subset of information [for e-discovery] but now regulators have deemed
that what is important is much larger – pretty much everything.
"It's almost a case of Emperor's new clothes – the ECM systems are naked
because they don't understand content. We have the technology to read content
and do analysis on the basis of what it means, not just on the basis of what
reference number has been attached to it.
"The big new ideas are meaning – understanding the meaning of content – and
we'll see all ECM vendors moving to meaning-based solutions eventually. The
second one is manage-in-place – not moving content out of 9,000 repositories
into a central repository but keeping the information in place. With Interwoven
we've got a top-of-the-line standard model ECM [system] and we've put in meaning
technology and manage-in-place technology so we can radically move the market
forward into new models.
"If you can do meaning you can also implement hybrid cloud and on-site
systems. So the software in the organisation can understand a document and
therefore understand whether to keep hold of it on site or send it off to the
cloud repository. The issue is not so much the cloud as what goes where."
John Powell, president, chief executive and co-founder,
Alfresco
"You used to manage your inbox by filing stuff but in the past couple of
years email has got to a point where few people have time for that now. The
whole content management industry is on a similar curve with the underlying
unstructured information. Suddenly there's a whole new raft of information so
we've seen a move away from using email as a discussion and collaboration
environment to using collaboration tools where you keep the content in place and
bring people to the content. You can parallelise a lot of activity on that
content. It won't replace email but it's slowly changing the way people work
with information.
"The next step is to get a lot more intelligence into the way we are tracking
down interesting information. Search is all very well but you need to know what
you're searching for, and searching for content is still a pretty crude affair.
In future, technology that auto-classifies and dynamically tags information
within a collaborative CMS environment will enable users to subscribe to the
information they want. The point is getting the infrastructure deployed and
teaching people how to use it – it's still a challenge."
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article