Google's announcement that it will be entering the operating system market
has caused a big stir, but it is unlikely to cause anyone at Microsoft to lose
sleep, and more than a few senior managers at Redmond will be pleased as punch
at the news.
On the face of it, some have seen the
announcement
of Chrome OS as another attack on Microsoft. After all, Google Apps was a
direct shot across Redmond's bows in that it gave away similar applications to
Microsoft's Office suite, which is a huge cash cow for the company.
Surely Chrome OS is just an expansion of this corporate war? Well, not as
such. First off let's look at what Chrome OS actually is. It's really just a new
front end to a Linux kernel. There are plenty of Linux distributions out there
at the moment, and none of them is really threatening Microsoft's hold on the
operating system market.
Secondly, the new operating system is aimed at netbooks which, while a
fast
growing section of the computer market, isn't anywhere near as big a deal as
PCs, servers and laptops.
Windows is
holding
onto its market share in the netbook segment, and there are already
preinstalled versions of Linux available for the market. But people aren't going
for them in big numbers, despite some being clearly superior to Windows Vista.
Netbooks are primarily consumer devices, and consumers have been raised with
Microsoft systems for the past 15 years and are unlikely to risk anything new.
Similarly, manufacturers are used to installing Windows and know they can sell
systems with it.
This brings us on to the next point: preinstalling. Original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs) have remained pretty quiet about Chrome OS, and it will
have to be preinstalled to succeed. Skilled computer users might be able to
install and debug an operating system, but few businesses or consumers will want
to bother. They want something that works straight out of the box, or as near to
that as possible.
Naysayers might point out that computer manufacturers are motivated by cost,
and that Chrome OS will be free. But there are already plenty of free operating
systems out there, and OEMs are far more concerned about what people will buy
rather than saving a licensing fee that they can pass on to the purchaser
anyway.
Red Hat, Ubuntu and Debian, among others, have been offering enterprise-ready
operating systems for years at a fraction of the cost of Windows, yet OEMs have
not dipped much more than a tentative toe in the water to try them.
Another element is the broadly favourable response to Windows 7, which is
due
out later this year. While Vista is an almost universally recognised dog of
an operating system, Windows 7 actually
looks
rather good and businesses in particular are eager to try it out, since most
of them have stuck with XP and could use Windows 7 to jump the entire Vista
upgrade step.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article