24 Aug 2011
Windows XP offers improved driver support and a number of other enhancements to increase reliability. A new interface should help new users understand Windows more easily, and a less cluttered desktop will benefit everyone.
Pros:
Cleaner and simpler user interface, multiple user accounts, greater level of reliability, better support and management tools for businesses
Cons:
Older applications may not run, steeper hardware requirements than previous Windows releases, Professional edition also has Home edition's consumer features
This review was first published on 30 April 2001 in IT Week, a magazine predecessor of V3
Microsoft considers Windows XP to be the most significant operating system release since the introduction of Windows 95. Much of the underlying technology is based on Windows 2000, but the claim can be justified when the new user interface is considered.
Although the product's front end shows the most noticeable changes, there are many differences aimed at improved reliability, helping IT administrators roll out the product, control user settings and offer technical support.
This is the first time that Microsoft has offered consumer and business operating systems sharing the same user interface and core functionality. However, the Home edition of Windows XP omits many high-end features found in the Professional edition.
Most of the omissions are management features, such as group policy settings. Some remote management capabilities and automated system recovery are also excluded from the Home version, along with multiple monitor support, and file level access control and encryption. The Professional edition has all of the Home edition's features, including multimedia enhancements.
Hardware requirements are noticeably steeper than for previous versions of Windows. However, the minimum specification of 233MHz processor with 64MB RAM (128MB recommended) and at least 650MB of free disk space, shouldn't cause problems unless your PC was built more than two or three years ago.
Improved ease of use was one of Microsoft's main objectives for Windows XP. The new interface thus takes a different approach to arranging content and tasks. In an attempt to reduce the amount of unnecessary clutter on the desktop, Windows XP's interface adapts to display the most frequently accessed items, moving icons that are rarely opened into a separate folder.
Use of colour to highlight the Start button and key commands within applications should also guide newer users around the system. For existing users, a 'classic' version of the interface can be selected, which looks like the Windows 2000 front end.
Many of the interface changes are intended to support less experienced users, and this is borne out in Microsoft's decision to restructure on-screen instructions and navigation links. These have been reorganised to provide a more task-based approach to working.
For example, entities such as My Computer now provide immediate access to common tasks like creating a new folder, rather than forcing users to search through menus. Tasks are also context-dependent, so the interface will show the most commonly executed tasks in each window.
One of the most significant additions to Windows XP is the ability for multiple users to log into the system. User sessions can be run simultaneously; if you log out while a task is running, it carries on in the background, even if another user logs in. Windows XP offers three levels of user access: Administrator, which offers complete control over the system, a Standard configuration and a Limited level, which is primarily aimed at children sharing a family PC.
Improved reliability, in terms of everyday operation and driver support, has been another of Microsoft's aims for Windows XP. Driver signing, intended to reduce the risk of system crashes, has been introduced. Each time a new driver is installed on the system, XP checks for a signature, and displays a warning for unsigned drivers.
IT managers can also configure workgroup policy settings so that unsigned drivers will not be accepted. To facilitate easier driver sign-off through Windows Hardware Quality Labs, Microsoft is introducing a 'quick sign' process, which enables hardware vendors to self-test XP drivers using an online checklist. This raises some questions over the level of trust Microsoft is putting in vendors to follow its procedures correctly.
A redesigned version of the System Restore tool, first seen in Windows Me, has also been included. System Restore enables users to save system settings at regular intervals, or before new hardware is installed. The tool can then be used to 'roll back' the operating system to its previous state if there are any problems.
Related reviews
Review categories
Laptops (112) | Tablets (65) | Mobile Phones (169) |
Dell XPS 13 review | Asus Transformer Pad TF300 video review | Samsung Galaxy S3 video review |
Other product categories
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
The Role: As a Field Service Engineer working from...
The Role: Make the most of your IT knowledge in one...
Head of IT / Infrastructure Manager (Marketing Services...
A Multi-national data analytic's and cloud computing...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Response to comment - "Still a winner"
It seems surprising that someone who works on computers for a living finds XP so wonderful. I find Marc Klink's commentary very weird indeed. All O/Ses suck, of course, but Microsoft offerings do suck the most obviously. To find out why one needs to read: http://en.windows7sins.org/ and also to test drive a few other O/Ses, such as some of the better known GNU/Linux distros, Google Chrome, etc., etc. They can all be downloaded for free from the web and will deliver the same functionality, or sometimes better, than Windows. You can use that old 486 that's gathering dust in the loft for this, something that won't work with XP
Posted by: John M. 06 Sep 2011
Still a winner!
I was one of the first to get Windows XP, because I was given a full copy at a promotional expo for Microsoft. I immediately went home to install it, as I had read about the benefits during the closed beta cycle. It was everything I wanted, and more. It broke the 512MB barrier of Win 9x, it also broke the artificial 128GB limit for drive space, and I was a very happy camper. Perhaps the biggest thing about it was that the three 64k heaps, which forced reboots every few hours on Windows 9x versions, were nowhere to be found! This was truly heaven! Things only got better with Service Pack 2, and Windows XP, though it still has certain bugs that were never fixed, always has a way around them. It is like a well worn, but not worn-out, pair of shoes, comfortable and with no surprises. Though I have machines with Vista and Windows 7 also, having gotten promo copies of both at their launches, and using all of them as I work on computers for a living, I still prefer Windows XP, no matter the speed, or the capabilities of the machine. Had I been heading the development at Microsoft, Windows 7 would have the underpinnings of 64 bit XP, and use the Vista/7 eye candy as a change of pace, for those that wanted it - another Theme, if you will. Security changes could have come without breaking away from the things that made XP great. Change is not always for the better, it is simply change. Long live XP, 2014 and beyond.
Posted by: Marc Klink 24 Aug 2011