18 Dec 2009
Price: Free
Manufacturer: Google
Web browsers are a bit like fridges. They do one simple job and, no matter how many gadgets and widgets and doodads and thingummybobs you hang on them, they will always just be there to keep your beer cold in one case, and let you at the contents of the world wide web in the other.
We've always found it a bit odd that people are prepared to enter into heated discussions about their favourite flavour of web browser. It's a bit like being passionate about a breakfast cereal, or your favourite type of pencil.
Mac users have been well served in the past with Apple's Safari, which is fast, simple, stable and doesn't constantly nag you to use the company's products and services. It can, however, be a little flaky with some complex sites. The content management system that we use refuses point blank to have anything to do with Safari, for example.
In such cases, most Macolytes will turn to Mozilla's Firefox. The fact that most Mac users would rather just not use the internet at all than have to resort to Microsoft's bloated, overcomplicated and self-serving mess of a browser is testament either to their convictions, or their stupidity. We'll let you decide.
There are, of course, dozens of other Mac-friendly web browsers out there and the comments section is bound to be full of people howling with derision because we have failed to mention Opera or Sunrise or Seamonkey or Camino or Flock any of the other also-rans, but for our purposes here we are going to discount them as niche offerings made by and aimed at beardy geeks.
As far as we are concerned there are only three contenders for the King of the Browsers crown: Safari, Firefox and Internet Explorer. And since it is quite clear that anyone willing to besmirch their beloved Mac with Internet Explorer is almost certainly clinically insane, we are down to just two.
The third way
Since Tuesday, however, there has been a third viable alternative in the form of Google's Chrome for OS X. It's not quite clear why the company that has dominated the whole internet search canon for so many years that Yahoo is just a distant memory took so long to come up with its own browser. But the Wintel version has been knocking about as a stable release for just under a year and, with the entire source code for Chrome released into the wild as an open-source project called Chromium soon after, Linux and OSX versions were eagerly anticipated.
There have been developer builds of Chrome for OS X kicking around for some time now, but Google has finally bitten the bullet and released an official beta which, although incomplete, gives a flavour of what to expect if the software ever makes it to a full version. And let's face it, Google is well known for dragging its heels when it comes to losing the beta label on most of its offerings. Having said that, Google is promising to upgrade the beta release to 'stable' by 12 January.
Having used Chrome on our Mac Pro for a couple of days now, what is becoming clear is that the current release probably doesn't deserve the lofty status of beta, feeling very much more like an alpha, not least because some pretty large chunks of the software's functionality is missing.
Despite the fact that there are over 300 plug-ins - or extensions as Google is calling them - available for Windows users, so far the Mac faithful have been left out in the cold, despite the fact that they were included in the developer versions. Also missing from the beta release are a working bookmark manager, the ability to view PDF files, bookmark synchronisation and 64-bit support.
Owners of older Macs will also be disappointed to find that the release is Intel only, not least because there is no port of the Google Native Client which only works on x86 systems. Given that it took over a year to develop this version, the chances of a PowerPC port are, quite frankly, slim to none.
Related reviews
Review categories
Laptops (112) | Tablets (65) | Mobile Phones (169) |
Dell XPS 13 review | Asus Transformer Pad TF300 video review | Samsung Galaxy S3 video review |
Other product categories
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Java Deveoper/Programmer/Software Engineer, Algo Trading...
Austin Fraser has the pleasure of appointing a number...
Austin Fraser has the pleasure of appointing a Java Developer...
Austin Fraser has the pleasure of appointing a Senior...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
IE not an option on Mac
I've found the biggest issue is trying to access MS sites using available Mac browsers. For example MS CRM won't function on anything but IE, and MS Webmail 'degrades' on all but IE such that you can't search emails, list by sender etc etc. IE5 is the most recent MS browser for Mac, which is no use either. So it's not so much that Macolytes won't use IE, but rather they can't. I think it's something to do with MS using proprietary code in their browsers... down with that sort of thing and great if one of the other providers can step in and provide compatibility with these sites.
Posted by: omalleyb 07 Jan 2010