27 Oct 2009
Though still pricey compared to equivalent Windows PC set-ups, the new iMac line-up is more capable than ever, although the imminent quad-core model promises to be the real eye-opener.
Pros:
Brilliant LED-backlit screens; across-the-board specification increases; quad-core model promises blistering performance.
Cons:
Magic Mouse is awkward to hold.

Price: £949 (21in)
Manufacturer: Apple
Apple's latest update to its all-in-one iMacs refines rather than reinvents the classic desktop design, but the changes are still considerable. The 27in iMac sits at the top of the range and, while its new 16:9 widescreen display might make it a bit too ostentatious for some desktops, designers (and anyone else looking for a vast expanse of screen space) will welcome its 2,560 x 1,440 resolution.
The squatter aspect ratio means that the 27in iMac is no taller than the outgoing 24in model, and the overall shape is much the same, although the whole enclosure is now made from a single slab of aluminium for a similar 'unibody' feel as the MacBook Pro.
Another MacBook Pro design touch is the glass screen that extends right to the edge of the case for a frameless front-end. The 'chin' that sits below has also shrunk, and the new iMacs look more like mere monitors than complete computers than ever before.
All iMac screens are now LED backlit, and this technology is both whiter and brighter than the old CCFL displays. It can be set to a much lower brightness level than the old iMac screens too, making these new models much more comfortable to use in dimly lit environments.
The new screens are also thinner and run cooler than those of the old iMacs and, rather than reduce the depth of the case, Apple has used the extra space to fit a big enough cooling system to cope with Intel desktop processors. The switch from mobile chips has little impact on performance (of which more in a moment), but bigger, slower-spinning fans mean less noise when the iMac is under load.
One other minor benefit is that the new iMacs also have room for four memory module slots, which not only means that there's now a 16GB RAM limit, but that inexpensive 2GB SODIMMs can be used for an 8GB configuration. The old two-slot iMacs can only use costly 4GB modules.
Core 2 Duo processors running at 3.06GHz are now standard for all iMacs. This was an additional built-to-order expense on the old models. Despite being a desktop (Intel E7600) chip, this offers no real edge over an old iMac with a same-speed mobile processor, but a stock 4GB of RAM and beefier graphics does provide more bang for much the same buck as before.
Apple is also offering the 27in iMac with Intel's Core i5 or Core i7 processor. Available in November, prices start at £1,599 for the 2.66GHz model, which should offer similar workstation-level performance to the £1,899 Mac Pro and a similar display to the £1,173 30in Cinema Display. That's quite a saving.
One final note: all iMacs now ship with Apple's new Magic Mouse as standard and you can see what we think of that in our separate review coming soon.
Related reviews
Review categories
Laptops (108) | Tablets (56) | Mobile Phones (155) |
Asus Zenbook UX21E ultrabook review | Asus Transformer Prime review | Nokia Lumia 710 video review |
Other product categories
Firm also discusses Blackberry 10 system
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
My client based in Basingstoke are currently recruiting...
Digital Service Delivery Manager Public Sector / NHS...
C#, ASP.Net, .Net 3.5, LinQ, Design Patterns, Nunit...
TEST MANAGER (Edinburgh or Glasgow) Harvey Nash's...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Making Music
The new imacs look really great. If like me you use mac for making music you may find this review interesting http://bit.ly/7A67ky
Posted by: Chris 15 Dec 2009
Price
Only if i could afford one i would love one. I am a Windows PC/Laptop user and have always taken a shine to the stunning iMac design and quality. The downside is that they are very well over priced. Apple is ripping people off, upgrades specially RAM is just hidiously priced. I would love the new iMac that is coming out but i priced it for me what i would want and unless i got £2500 to spend i wont get one, i also don't have that money so i cannot have one. I wish they priced there computers at reasonable prices. I think more people would switch if they did. I so much want one but will probably never own one. Reason is for the spec i want, which is rather just standard it will cost me £2500. If i was to get a PC for tha much the spec would be outstanding not just ok.
Posted by: Mathew 31 Oct 2009
Price Compared to which PC equivalents?
I loved your article, I just had one note for thought. Amongst your summary you listed that it was pricey compared to it's PC equivalent but I think you're missing the fact that this 27in. model does NOT HAVE a PC equivalent... There is no other monitor on the market to date, much less an IPS panel monitor that is 27 inch and that has the same level of pixel density packed into that size of a screen. There is not even 1... NO OTHER monitor on the market will give you this quality... I'm not sure if you realize but all other all-in-one PC's use TN panel monitors which are quite cheap and poor quality. IPS panel monitors is the industry standard for graphic designers as well as the movie industry standard and this is what Apple is using in the new iMacs. Of the IPS monitors you will find on the market (26inch being the largest), NONE have the level of pixel density (2,560 x 1,440) that the iMac does. Also note that IPS panel monitors start at $1500 (for the 26in. models) so for only $200 more you can a high powered desktop computer with the iMac. Not only this but there is also no PC all-in-one system that uses LED backlit panels that I'm aware of either. All this to say that there is no PC equivalent and the old argument that Apple computers cost more than PC just isn't relevant anymore. Hell it wasn't even relevant 3 years ago if you looked at the value of all the parts that make up the systems...
Posted by: Michael Perry 28 Oct 2009
LCD Panels
All new models ship with LG/Phillips H-IPS panels, not just the quad cores (the iMac 24 as well).
Posted by: Grey 27 Oct 2009