All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis


Hacktivists target US Justice Department in Swartz protest

28 Jan 2013
aaron-swartz

Hackers operating under the Anonymous banner have claimed responsibility for an attack on the US Department of Justice website.

The hackers claimed responsibility for the attack via messages on Twitter, Pastebin and YouTube on Saturday.

The messages promised that the site's defacement was the start of a wider attack, pledging to publish information stolen during the cyber raid at a later date.

At the time of publishing the Justice Department had not responded to V3's request for comment on the attack and Anonymous' claims.

The attack was listed as being a part of the Anonymous collective's wider #OpLastResort campaign.

The campaign was started earlier in January in protest at the treatment of internet activist and Reddit founder Aaron Swartz, who died earlier this month.

Swartz had faced trial on charges that he used the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's computer networks to steal over four million articles from the JSTOR online archive and journal distribution service.

If found guilty he faced up to 31 years in jail and a potential $1m fine. Security experts have since questioned the hackers' claims.

Sophos senior technology consultant Graham Cluley added that there is no way to tell the authenticity of the claims.

"The claims that they have got their hands on sensitive US government information and plan to release it, it's impossible for us to verify," Cluley told V3.

"We'll just have to wait and see. In the past many claims have been made under the banner of ‘Anonymous' - some of them have turned out to be true, and some of them have turned out to be false."

F-Secure security researcher Sean Sullivan agreed that at present it was only clear that the attack was a web site defacement.

Sullivan warned that further attacks similar to the one on the Justice Department will likely continue to be mounted under the #OpLastResort banner for the foreseeable future.

"Such defacements will undoubtedly continue. But if activists continue to call them attacks, and continue to make unsubstantiated claims, they have less and less impact," he told V3.

  • Comment  
  • Tweet  
  • Google plus  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Stumble Upon  
Alastair Stevenson
About

Alastair has worked as a reporter covering security and mobile issues at V3 since March 2012. Before entering the field of journalism Alastair had worked in numerous industries as both a freelance copy writer and artist.

View Alastair's Google+ profile

More on Security
What do you think?
blog comments powered by Disqus
Poll

BYOD vs CYOD vs BYOC poll

Which approach is your firm taking to managing employees' mobile devices?
20%
14%
4%
21%
29%
12%

Popular Threads

Powered by Disqus
Galaxy S5 vs One M8 video review

Galaxy S5 vs HTC One M8 video review

We see which Android contender is best for business

Updating your subscription status Loading
Newsletters

Get the latest news (daily or weekly) direct to your inbox with V3 newsletters.

newsletter sign-up button
hpv33

Data protection: the key challenges

Deduplication is a foundational technology for efficient backup and recovery

rdc2

iPad makes its mark in the enterprise

The iPad can become a supercharged unified communications endpoint, allowing users to enhance their productivity

Mid/Senior level Java Developers - Multiple Roles (Java/J2EE)

Mid/Senior level Java Developers - Java, J2EE/ JEE...

Software Engineer

Software Developer C#/.NET I am currently recruiting...

Marketing Director Contract Central London

Marketing Director Required | Long Term contract | Leading...

Web Application Developers - multiple positions

My client, a bespoke software house in the heart of Devon...
To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.