All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis


Apple wins another patent case against Motorola

19 Dec 2012
An Apple logo

An International Trade Commission (ITC) Judge has ruled that Apple's iPhone does not infringe on a Motorola Mobility patent.

Judge Thomas Pender found that the patent in question, number 6246862, is invalid because of prior art found in an older patent. Motorola's patent covers technology used to prevent accidental touchscreen input. The case still has to go in front of an ITC commission for final review.

According to Judge Pender, Motorola's patent is invalid due to prior art found in patent number 6052464. The judge ruled that the prior art showed that the patent at the heart of the case was an obvious evolution of existing technology.

Patent number 624682 covers technology which prevents accidental touchscreen input through the use of a close-proximity sensor. The patent was originally assigned to Motorola in 1989.

Judge Pender originally ruled that Apple was not guilty of infringement in the case because Motorola's use of the term "close-proximity sensor" was too broad for an infringement determination.

Following that ruling, an ITC commission asked Pender to re-review the case on behalf of Motorola. The commission will now review Judge Pender's latest ruling for a final determination.

This isn't the only case between Apple and Motorola to receive a ruling recently. A Wisconsin judge dismissed a case between Apple and Motorola in November.

Judge Barbara Crabb dismissed the case under the belief that Apple would not have followed the courts guidance if a pro-Motorola verdict was given.

Both Apple and Motorola were unavailable for comment at the time of this posting.

  • Comment  
  • Tweet  
  • Google plus  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Stumble Upon  
James Dohnert
About

James is a freelance writer and editor. In addition to ClickZ, his work has appeared in publications like V3, The Commonwealth Club, CachedTech.com, and Shonen Jump magazine. He studied Journalism at Weber State University.

More on Law
What do you think?
blog comments powered by Disqus
Poll

BYOD vs CYOD vs BYOC poll

Which approach is your firm taking to managing employees' mobile devices?
20%
14%
4%
21%
29%
12%

Popular Threads

Powered by Disqus
Galaxy S5 vs One M8 video review

Galaxy S5 vs HTC One M8 video review

We see which Android contender is best for business

Updating your subscription status Loading
Newsletters

Get the latest news (daily or weekly) direct to your inbox with V3 newsletters.

newsletter sign-up button
hpv33

Data protection: the key challenges

Deduplication is a foundational technology for efficient backup and recovery

rdc2

iPad makes its mark in the enterprise

The iPad can become a supercharged unified communications endpoint, allowing users to enhance their productivity

Mid/Senior level Java Developers - Multiple Roles (Java/J2EE)

Mid/Senior level Java Developers - Java, J2EE/ JEE...

Software Engineer

Software Developer C#/.NET I am currently recruiting...

Marketing Director Contract Central London

Marketing Director Required | Long Term contract | Leading...

Web Application Developers - multiple positions

My client, a bespoke software house in the heart of Devon...
To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.