This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. > Find out more here
by Dan Worth
06 Nov 2012
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has fined insurance and pensions giant Prudential £50,000 after a database mix up.
The incident saw two separate customers with the same first name, surname and same date of birth mixed up in its database, a situation that caused thousands of pounds from one of the individual's retirement funds to be placed in the others.
This was despite a warning from one of the customers that he had not changed address in 15 years after he received a letter from the firm confirming his supposed change of address.
The ICO said the firm failed to investigate properly and it took some three years for the situation to be finally resolved in 2010 after the problem was first in the system in 2007.
Stephen Eckersley, ICO head of enforcement, said the case should serve as a warning that firms holding personal data must keep records accurate and up-to-date in order to comply with the Data Protection Act.
"In this case two customer files were consistently confused and the company failed to remedy the situation despite being alerted to the problem on more than one occasion before it was finally resolved," he said.
"This case would be considered farcical were it not for the serious sums of money involved."
Prudential apologised for the mistake and said it had compensated the customers affected but accepted the ICO's findings.
"The problem was rectified in 2010 to the satisfaction of the ICO. We co-operated openly and fully with the review and we accept the fine imposed," it said.
"When this issue came to light we reviewed our procedures and staff training and made changes to minimise the chances of a similar error occurring again."
The fine could be reduced to £40,000 if the firm pays up by 29 November.
The fine is notable as not only is it one of the rarer occasions when the private sector has been fined by the ICO but it relates to data handling practices, rather than data loss - the usual cause of hefty fines from the data watchdog.
"Inaccurate information on a customer's record, particularly when the record relates to an individual's financial affairs, can have a significant impact on someone's life," warned Eckersley.
"We hope this penalty sends a message to all organisations, but particularly those in the financial sector, that adequate checks must be in place to ensure people's records are accurate."
The fine comes after the ICO confirmed to V3 that fines levied against the public sector for data breaches have passed £2m, a notable waste of public funds at a time when front line services are already facing limited budgets.
Latest stories from Finance
Related videos
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
How concerned are you by the rising tide of cyber threats?
BlackBerry's latest smartphone is a mid-tier handset that will cost less than the Q10 and Z10
Updating your subscription status
Connect with V3.co.uk
It's no longer one or other with web security; you can now have a virtualisation and SaaS hybrid model
BYOD is important for employee satisfaction, but poses challenges in terms of security, productivity loss and costs
A Support Analyst with good commercial experience and...
A Business Analyst is required by a leading international...
An Oracle DBA is required by one of the UK's leading...
A Senior Support Analyst with good commercial experience...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree