All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis


Microsoft loses anti-trust appeal but fine reduced to €860m

27 Jun 2012
microsoft-entrance-redmond

The EU General Court has decreased an anti-trust fine first issued against Microsoft in 2008 but dismissed the company's appeal against the overall ruling.

While maintaining it "essentially upholds the Commission's decision" the EU General Court chose to reduce the fine from its initial fee of €899m to €860m.

The company first fell foul of anti-trust regulators in 2004, when it was fined €497m for using its PC software market dominance to block competitors.

Specifically, the European Commission (EC) claimed Microsoft's refusal to release code that could have been used to by other companies to create products compatible with its own was stifling innovation.

Alongside the fine the ruling ordered Microsoft to make its server software code available to competitors so their products could work alongside it.

The EC later added a further fine in 2008 after it ruled Microsoft had failed to comply with the order.

At the time of publishing Microsoft had not responded to V3's request for comment on the ruling.

EC vice president Joaquín Almunia issued a statement praising the court's decision.

"Today's judgement fully vindicates the enforcement action that the Commission took to ensure Microsoft's compliance with its obligations," he said.

"The ruling confirms that Microsoft did not comply with the Commission's decision and that the Commission was right to impose a penalty, even though the Court chose to slightly reduce the amount of the penalty payment from €899m to €860m."

The EU is also currently considering an anti-trust investigation into Google. Most recently EU competition commissioner Almunia said its initial investigations had identified four areas of concerns over Google's businesses practices.

Following the ruling Bruce Kilpatrick, head of the competition law team at legal firm Addleshaw Goddard, said the court's decision should act as a warning to Google.

"The court agreed with the Commission that Microsoft had failed to allow its competitors access to interoperability information on reasonable terms, and largely upheld the penalties imposed for every day that Microsoft did not comply with its ruling," said Kilpatrick.

"This amounted to a huge sum and other technology companies currently embroiled in anti-trust disputes, including Google, will be taking note."

  • Comment  
  • Tweet  
  • Google plus  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Stumble Upon  
Alastair Stevenson
About

Alastair has worked as a reporter covering security and mobile issues at V3 since March 2012. Before entering the field of journalism Alastair had worked in numerous industries as both a freelance copy writer and artist.

View Alastair's Google+ profile

More on Government
What do you think?
blog comments powered by Disqus
Poll

BYOD vs CYOD vs BYOC poll

Which approach is your firm taking to managing employees' mobile devices?
21%
13%
4%
21%
30%
11%

Popular Threads

Powered by Disqus
Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet powered by Android KitKat 4.4

Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet video

We take a look at the lightweight, waterproof tablet

Updating your subscription status Loading
Newsletters

Get the latest news (daily or weekly) direct to your inbox with V3 newsletters.

newsletter sign-up button
hpv33

Data protection: the key challenges

Deduplication is a foundational technology for efficient backup and recovery

rdc2

iPad makes its mark in the enterprise

The iPad can become a supercharged unified communications endpoint, allowing users to enhance their productivity

Lead .Net Developer – Document / Data Transformation

Lead .Net Developer – Document / Data Transformation...

SharePoint Developer

SharePoint Developer – Data Development £60,000...

BizTalk Developer

BizTalk Developer £65,000 + benefits / Luton...

Project Manager – Risk, Planning, Control and Stakeholder management

Project Manager – Risk, Planning, Control and Stakeholder...
To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.