09 Dec 2011
Apple could be banned from selling a range its products in Germany, including the iPhone 4S and the iPad 2, after Motorola won an injunction.
The case relates to wireless technology patents owned by Motorola and the decision to grant an injunction is a huge setback for Apple, who until now have had the upper hand in several ongoing legal disputes with technology rivals.
Motorola had already achieved a default judgment while Apple readied its appeal for that decision but the Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court again ruled in favour of Motorola in a hearing on Friday.
Apple confirmed it would appeal the ruling and told its customers in Germany that it was confident its products would remain on sale.
"We're going to appeal the court's ruling right away. Holiday shoppers in Germany should have no problem finding the iPad or iPhone they want," it said.
Motorola's general counsel Scott Offer welcomed the ruling as proof Motorola was right to take action against Apple in the courts.
"Today's decision validates Motorola's efforts to enforce its patents against Apple's infringement," he said.
"We have been negotiating with Apple and offering them reasonable licensing terms and conditions since 2007, and will continue our efforts to resolve our global patent dispute as soon as practicable."
Patent analyst Florian Mueller told V3 that Apple can no longer sell products that fall foul of the relevant patent unless it modifies the devices in question, which could prove unworkable.
"Apple is banned from selling all devices that infringe the patent-in-suit. If they dropped the patented functionality, they'd be fine, but it's unclear whether that's a viable option," he said.
He added that Apple would definitely appeal the ruling to try to hold up the injunction for the duration of the appeals proceedings.
If Apple fails to get the injunction suspended, Motorola will be able to enforce the ban on the products being sold in the country, but at the risk of severe financial loss further down the line due to the inclusion of a bond of €100m in the ruling, Mueller said.
"This is the amount Motorola might have to pay Apple if the injunction is later overturned by an appellate [appeals] court. If you enforce an improperly-granted injunction while it's being appealed, you're liable later if you lose," Mueller told V3.
The original bond request by Apple was a whopping €2bn but the judge lowered this to €100m.
The decision is a huge twist in the ongoing legal battles taking place between major smartphone and tablet vendors, which have seen Apple and Samsung in particular taking each other on in courts across the world.
Latest stories from Mobile Software
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
A Multi-national data analytic's and cloud computing...
A multi-national software solutions organisation are...
A multi-national software solution provider are looking...
Service Delivery Manager, Customer Service, PCT, Primary...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Use the software developers....
I said awhile back that the hardware race has ended with 4 major mobile CPU manufacturers the speed and hardware spec of the top smartphones will be matched for quite awhile. While apple is seems to not want to pay for technology they are using they should turn to very creative software developers to make their smartphone standout from the rest....think about it you don`t press the hardware inside your phone you press whats on the screen and that makes all the difference.... if they are smart enough.
Posted by: efex 09 Dec 2011