06 Dec 2011
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) announced on Tuesday that it has served its highest data protection penalty fine of £130,000 to Powys County Council after details about a child protection case were sent to the wrong recipient.
The ICO gained the power to fine organisations up to £500,000 for serious breaches of the Data Protection Act in April last year, but has been reluctant to do so, preferring to educate rather than punish offenders.
Anne Jones, ICO assistant commissioner for Wales, said that the fine follows two others imposed on UK councils in the past three weeks after the disclosure of sensitive information about vulnerable people.
"It's the most serious case yet and it has attracted a record fine. The ICO has also issued a legal notice ordering the council to take action to improve its data handling. Failure to do so will result in legal action being taken through the courts," she said.
The Powys data protection breach occurred when two separate reports about child protection cases were sent to the same shared printer, according to the ICO.
It is believed that two pages from one report were mistakenly collected with the papers from another case and were sent out without being checked.
The recipient of the two pages of the report knew the parent and child whose personal details were included in the papers, and complained to the council.
No particular individual has been named by the ICO as responsible for the mistake.
"There is clearly an underlying problem with data protection in social services departments and we will be meeting with stakeholders from across the UK's local government sector to discuss how we can support them in addressing these problems," said Jones.
The ICO enforcement notice places a legal requirement on Powys County Council to train its entire staff to follow the council's guidance on the handling of personal data by 31 March 2012, with refresher training provided every three years.
Latest stories from Privacy
Related videos
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Java Deveoper/Programmer/Software Engineer, Algo Trading...
Austin Fraser has the pleasure of appointing a number...
Austin Fraser has the pleasure of appointing a Java Developer...
Austin Fraser has the pleasure of appointing a Senior...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Tax The Welsh Because the Council's Incompetent
Whilst this council are STOOPID and need to review procedures, where's the sense in imposing a monetary fine on the council. Ultimately the people that will have to pay the fine are the council tax payers of Powys. The very data subjects whose data is being poorly secured by the council. Fine the individual officers responsible. Or if it isn't attributable to an individual officer, fine the person responsible for having proper security practices in place. It's bonkers John
Posted by: John 07 Dec 2011