21 Sep 2011
BT has been forced to change part of the advertising campaign for its Infinity broadband product after the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) upheld two complaints by fierce rival Virgin Media.
One complaint centred around wording in a BT Infinity advert that said: 'Most of our customers are already seeing at least three times faster speeds.' Virgin argued that this erroneously implies that most customers had the service.
A second complaint about the same advert argued that it was not clear enough that the Infinity service has limited availability.
A third complaint focused on the wording of another advert which stated that customers unable to get the Infinity service can still get a 20Mbit/s package before being upgraded to Infinity, which Virgin said implied the availability of other fibre products.
The ASA ruling upheld the first and second complaints, but rejected the third. Despite this, BT welcomed the decision and said that it will adhere to the ASA ruling.
"We understand that the ruling clarifies that the ASA wants the fact that BT Infinity is rapidly rolling out, but not yet 'widely available', to be made clearer in the body copy of press ads," BT said.
"While we accept this point, we see this as a minor point of clarification, particularly when compared with recent broadband claims upheld against Virgin."
As well as this reference to Virgin's own troubles with the ASA, BT also attacked its rival's network coverage, as the firms show no signs of backing down in the war of words over their broadband products.
"We'll seek to clarify with the ASA how they define 'widely available', given the restricted availability of Virgin Media's own fibre broadband compared to BT's broadband network," the statement continued.
"BT has publicly stated that it plans to pass two thirds of homes with fibre-based superfast broadband by 2015, which will surpass Virgin's current network availability."
V3 contacted Virgin Media for a response to the ASA ruling, but the firm declined to comment.
Virgin and BT have fallen foul of the ASA on previous occasions as the companies battle for supremacy in the broadband market.
Latest stories from Networks
Related videos
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
IT Support Analyst (initial 6 month fixed term) Cirencester...
Java Developer - Graduate / Budding Superstar opportunity...
Solution Consultant - JEE, Support, Project Lead, SQL...
C++ Developer - C++, STL, Boost, Delphi, Concurrency...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
The Law is an ass
It is vaguely possible the second complaint might be reasonable, but if Virgin Media can't understand 1 and 3 then I'm certainly not going to risk moving to their offering!
Posted by: Robin 21 Sep 2011
Broadband
While both these companies "BT" and Virgin" fight it out the customer suffers. I live in an area where according to a Virgin engineer fibre or cable will not be installed for at least 5yrs and while I can get Infinity I won't pay the price for the speeds I get. These companies will justify the pricing throught the cable and labour but for goodness sake think about it, make it affordable and you will prosper in the long run.
Posted by: william millar 21 Sep 2011