03 Aug 2011
The Metropolitan Police has taken to Twitter to warn would-be hacktivists exactly which laws they will break if they engage in any illegal hacking activity.
In an unusual move, the force, which is home to the Police Central e-Crime Unit, posted a link to a Tweetdeck statement revealing that investigations into Anonymous and LulzSec are ongoing, and that it wants to "remind people of the law in this area".
"Anyone considering accessing a computer without authority should understand that such acts are unlawful and can carry a term of imprisonment," the Met said.
"Under UK legislation, it is an offence if a person acts from within the UK upon a computer anywhere else in the world. It is also an offence [for] someone anywhere else in the world to criminally affect a computer."
The statement goes on to clarify that anyone gaining unauthorised access to or modifying computer material could face two years in jail under the Computer Misuse Act, while those who try to impair the operation of another computer, prevent or hinder access to a program or its operation may face up to 10 years.
"These offences cover the acts of unauthorised access to personal accounts, distributed denial-of-service attacks and intrusive hacks where data is taken or systems changed. Other jurisdictions have similar laws," said the Met.
Sophos senior technology consultant Graham Cluley welcomed the Met's move, which is likely to be an attempt to counter the argument by many hacktivists that what they do is merely a form of lawful protest.
"In my opinion, it's a timely warning by the Met Police, as it comes after a series of arrests of individuals suspected of being involved in Anonymous and LulzSec hacktivist activity, most recently the charging of an 18 year-old man from Shetland alleged to be LulzSec's spokesman 'Topiary'," he wrote in a blog post.
"After other Anonymous-related arrests, we have seen internet attacks against Dutch and Italian police. Presumably the UK police are keen that Topiary-supporting hacktivists don't use the internet in a revenge attack."
However, Anonymous remained defiant in a tweeted response. "We don't recognise that law. What we do is legitimate peaceful protest, and that isn't a crime despite what the corrupt lawmakers say," the group said.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
A Multi-national data analytic's and cloud computing...
A multi-national software solutions organisation are...
A multi-national software solution provider are looking...
Service Delivery Manager, Customer Service, PCT, Primary...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Act's and Law's
Well the police are retarded as usual. An act like say the computer misuse act is exactly that, an ACT not a LAW Acts are given the force of law through the consent of the governed, ergo if you do not consent to the fascist rules of the UK Nazi state then you do not have to follow them WE WILL KEEP FIGHING OPPRESSION AND THE UK POLICE AND GOV CAN GO DIE PAINFULLY AND SLOWLY IN A DITCH SOMEWHERE DIE SCUM
Posted by: youdonotneedmynameyouevilpieceofspyware 04 Aug 2011
hacktivists - why illegal?
Jack straw in the previous labour government made the hacking of all uk emails legal by the establishment - under anti terrorist legislation - but in fact this was just an extension of the big brother mentality of the political establishment. If these young hackers are exposing corruption in any part of government - then goodluck to them.
Posted by: derek oram 03 Aug 2011
lawl
someone from the met needs to differeniate between a statutory act and the LAW - else thats pure dereliction, but when the met actually starts arresting real law breakers, like the ian tomlinson KILLER, and others, im sure the citizens shall learn live by the examples set by those in authority, till then, they can suck bawz
Posted by: Daggle 03 Aug 2011
DDOS
I have yet to understand the legal argument against DDOS. I also have yet to see a conviction for DDOS. DDOS is simply sending multiple requests to a server. Sure... if you use a botnet that is illegal, you're taking over computers. But if you do it on your own from a single computer? Isn't that like protesting outside of a building and if there are enough involved then no one can get in? That's legal. DDOS is just that... it makes it too congested to get in... so... what's the deal? I doubt it would stand in court for long.
Posted by: LTD.Edition 03 Aug 2011
Pot and Kettle
Is this from the same Met Police which has/had some members implicated in the Murdoch phone hacking? Wankers.
Posted by: daepok_dadx4 03 Aug 2011