28 Jul 2011
BT has been forced to block the Newzbin2 file-sharing web site in an historic High Court ruling won by the Motion Picture Association (MPA).
The MPA had called for the site to be blocked as it was hosting and making copyrighted content such as The King's Speech available for download.
BT had confirmed to V3 that it was going to challenge the ruling when the case was first heard in June.
Interestingly, BT welcomed the decision, claiming that it showed that court orders are a necessary step for rights holders when seeking to have a site taken offline.
"This is a helpful judgement which provides clarity on this complex issue. It clearly shows that rights holders need to prove their claims and convince a judge to make a court order," a BT spokesperson said.
"BT has consistently said that rights holders need to take this route. We will return to court after the summer to explain what kind of order we believe is appropriate."
Robin Fry, partner at law firm Beachcroft LLP, explained that the decision will have a major impact on the future of the web, as copyright holders will be able to have sites taken offline without complex and time-consuming legal challenges.
"Internet service providers will simply accede to any order made. They won't have the information or the enthusiasm to challenge these kind of applications if they're made from now on," he said.
"For the rights owners, with their claims for injunctions likely to go mostly unchallenged in the future, there will be far less risk than with claims against site owners which can become derailed with lengthy technical arguments."
Fry also noted that the case was won under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, making the Digital Economy Act (DEA), which was designed to enable web blocking, almost completely unnecessary.
"This could make much of the DEA now irrelevant and will allow rights owners to side-step possibly lengthy stages under the DEA before a web site can be taken down," he told V3.
However, Peter Bradwell, a campaigner at the Open Rights Group, was outraged by the decision, claiming that it will do nothing to solve the issue of file sharing and will stifle innovation.
"Web site blocking is pointless and dangerous. These judgements won't stop infringement or boost the creative industries, and there are serious risks of legitimate content being blocked and service slowdown," he said.
"If the goal is boosting creators' ability to make money from their work, we need to abandon these technologically naive measures, focus on genuine market reforms, and satisfy unmet consumer demand."
Latest stories from Government
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
A Multi-national data analytic's and cloud computing...
A multi-national software solutions organisation are...
A multi-national software solution provider are looking...
Service Delivery Manager, Customer Service, PCT, Primary...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Is it just bt?
Is it just bt or has the other isp's had to do this also? V3.co.uk response: It's just BT, but the ruling is likely to affect other ISPs in future.
Posted by: Kev 02 Aug 2011
Increased cost of access
This judgment is not about "taking down" websites - it is about increasing the cost of access to infringing websites for a substantial number of users of an ISP. This judgment is unlikley to give rights holders a silver bullet, since the threshholds for an order pursuant to s.97A of the CDPA remain high.
Posted by: Rustam Roy 02 Aug 2011
Big Goverment
Classic case of how goverments control what the people can watch and into thinking what they the lawmakers think good for them. Hopefully there will be more ways to for a free web.
Posted by: waltere nickerson 28 Jul 2011