All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis

BT forced to block Newzbin file-sharing web site in historic ruling

by Dan Worth

28 Jul 2011

Comments: 3

  • Tweet this
Royal Courts of Justice

BT has been forced to block the Newzbin2 file-sharing web site in an historic High Court ruling won by the Motion Picture Association (MPA).

The MPA had called for the site to be blocked as it was hosting and making copyrighted content such as The King's Speech available for download. 

BT had confirmed to V3 that it was going to challenge the ruling when the case was first heard in June.

Interestingly, BT welcomed the decision, claiming that it showed that court orders are a necessary step for rights holders when seeking to have a site taken offline.

"This is a helpful judgement which provides clarity on this complex issue. It clearly shows that rights holders need to prove their claims and convince a judge to make a court order," a BT spokesperson said.

"BT has consistently said that rights holders need to take this route. We will return to court after the summer to explain what kind of order we believe is appropriate."

Robin Fry, partner at law firm Beachcroft LLP, explained that the decision will have a major impact on the future of the web, as copyright holders will be able to have sites taken offline without complex and time-consuming legal challenges.

"Internet service providers will simply accede to any order made. They won't have the information or the enthusiasm to challenge these kind of applications if they're made from now on," he said.

"For the rights owners, with their claims for injunctions likely to go mostly unchallenged in the future, there will be far less risk than with claims against site owners which can become derailed with lengthy technical arguments."

Fry also noted that the case was won under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, making the Digital Economy Act (DEA), which was designed to enable web blocking, almost completely unnecessary.

"This could make much of the DEA now irrelevant and will allow rights owners to side-step possibly lengthy stages under the DEA before a web site can be taken down," he told V3.

However, Peter Bradwell, a campaigner at the Open Rights Group, was outraged by the decision, claiming that it will do nothing to solve the issue of file sharing and will stifle innovation.

"Web site blocking is pointless and dangerous. These judgements won't stop infringement or boost the creative industries, and there are serious risks of legitimate content being blocked and service slowdown," he said.

"If the goal is boosting creators' ability to make money from their work, we need to abandon these technologically naive measures, focus on genuine market reforms, and satisfy unmet consumer demand."

Do you agree?

 

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions. Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Poll

Flame virus poll

Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?

40%

0%

10%

50%

Connect with V3.co.uk

Sign up to our daily or weekly newsletters

Symanteccloud

Social networking: a guide for IT managers

Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them

Riverbed

Mitigating the risks of IT change

The importance of understanding your infrastructure

Business Development Executive

A Multi-national data analytic's and cloud computing...

C# Developer

A multi-national software solutions organisation are...

UI Application Designer

A multi-national software solution provider are looking...

Service Delivery Manager

Service Delivery Manager, Customer Service, PCT, Primary...

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.