06 Jul 2011
Ongoing discussions between internet service providers and rights holders on the implementation of web blocking measures in the Digital Economy Act (DEA) should be opened up to the public, according to Google.
Discussions are currently being held in private as industry stakeholders consider how web blocking provisions should work in practice under section 17 of the DEA. Ofcom is expected to produce its report on this issue in the near future.
However, Sarah Hunter, head of UK public policy at Google, questioned the wisdom of this strategy at a Westminster eForum event, arguing that, as the internet is an ownerless asset, the public needs to be involved in these discussions.
"There are conversations going on right now being led by companies, but it's not right as companies don't own the internet. The DEA showed how strongly people feel about how their internet is delivered," she said.
"If the government wants to make laws on blocking web sites they need to talk to consumers and have a proper debate in public. In Australia the government held a year-long consultation with the public before it reached any decision."
However, David Wheeldon, director of policy and public affairs at BSkyB, argued that measures must be brought in quickly as creative individuals and investors are increasingly threatened by illegal sites offering content.
"If the creators of content are not being remunerated we have to deal with it, otherwise we're undermining a very important industry. We can't ignore it and pretend it will sort itself out," he said at the event.
"As broadband speeds increase and access to the internet becomes ubiquitous, this will become a significant issue for the UK creative industries."
Internet minister Ed Vaizey said at the Intellect conference on Tuesday that web blocking is vital to protect the UK's creative talent.
"There are prominent web sites that stream live football or sell movies without permission from rights holders, and we should look at ways of stopping them," he said.
"No-one is saying business models don't have to change, but that doesn't mean you sit back and let people rip off other people's content."
Latest stories from Communications
Related videos
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Ihre Aufgaben Sie sind zuständig für die Beratung...
***MS Visual Basic Programmierer mit Oracle DB-Erfahrung...
IT Business Analyst Location: London, but...
Senior Software Developer Company overview...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Correction
There is no such thing as a creative "industry", just creative people.
Posted by: Flyinarage 07 Jul 2011
Democracy at Risk
Once the law is used to block websites, our democracy is at risk. When the public does not know what information is being blocked, we become as bad as China, Iran and North Korea and we will find ourselves living in a nation where the only information you see is what the Government wants you to see.
Posted by: M.A. Howley 06 Jul 2011