14 Apr 2011
Web sites that have seen their page rankings plummet after Google updated its algorithm have hit back at the search giant.
Google Panda was rolled out on 11 April with the aim of returning search results from high-quality web sites and downgrading those relying heavily on search engine optimisation.
Analyst firm Searchmetrics listed the the web sites that were negatively and positively affected by the update. Although the firm was unable to give specifics on traffic impact, chief executive Horst Joepen said that the reduced visibility would be "very bad" for web site traffic.
Consumer reviews web site Review Centre saw the biggest drop in ranking and admitted that the change in Google's algorithm would have a dramatic impact on traffic.
"[Google Panda] affected Review Centre, and has resulted in a significant drop to our Google traffic," it was noted in the Review Centre blog.
"We saw our US traffic drop, and we knew it was only a matter of weeks until it reached the UK. It's too early to say precisely what kind of a drop we've seen in the UK, but it is likely to be on a par with what we've seen in the US."
The blog post also went on to add that Review Centre had "stayed on the right side of Google's guidelines, while at the same time we've witnessed so many others show a blatant disregard for them - and continue to perform well".
"It's also ironic that, although Google have deemed our content not fit for their organic SERPs, they're still happy to publish our review content within their own vertical search products," the firm added.
A number of technology web sites including Tech Radar, Reghardware, PC Advisor and IT ProPortal also saw their visibility on Google plummet.
Pocket Lint was the worst hit with visibility dropping by 98.72 per cent after the Panda upgrade took effect.
Stuart Miles, the founder of Pocket Lint, told The Guardian that he was puzzled as to why the site suffered so much by the change in algorithm.
"We put out all original content. I could understand it if we copied and pasted everyone else and were a massive aggregator of crap. But we don't and we aren't," he said.
"As a small publisher, we're always trying our best to bring good stories to the table."
EBay UK, the National Lottery and This is Money were all listed by Searchmetrics as seeing the credibility of their sites rise under the Panda update.
Latest stories from Software
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Java Deveoper/Programmer/Software Engineer, Algo Trading...
Austin Fraser has the pleasure of appointing a number...
Austin Fraser has the pleasure of appointing a Java Developer...
Austin Fraser has the pleasure of appointing a Senior...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Panda Update
I personaly have spent 6 months working on my website to see every page with unique content removed totaly from google searches i have not done anything google see's as black hat to see all my efforts dissapear and believe me when i say i have had a 100% drop in traffic i do not have one page that is showing. it blows my brains to think that people who just dont care about how they get ranked can just carry on when the honest folks get stung. And you can try to get an answer out of google if you like to try a criptic puzzle. even they dont know what they are doing. i have worked hard and spent money on my site for it to be worth nothing. Who are Google ? What are Google ? Where are Google Going ?
Posted by: Julian 18 Jul 2011
Discount Vouchers not effected by Panda
If anyone wished for me to send them an image of our analytics then please contact me. Our traffic levels have not changed. I am pleased to say that our staff and customers are no longer worried. After Search Metrics published some false data I have had to calm fears. Maybe their data is not what they are stating. Check your facts guys. Regards Doug Scott MD www.discountvouchers.co.uk
Posted by: Doug Scott 15 Apr 2011
PageRank is not important!!!
Has there been a recent update or are you talking about the one back in January? I'm always reading conflicting information, however am still fortunate to have Page 1 google rankings for over 50 search terms, all of which have been earned through the constant updating of content, articles, blogs, press releases, social media, forums etc. As a current page rank 1 site I have to agree with information from Google which states that Pagerank does not guarantee high rankings, just bot visits. It's up to you to give them something new to look at when they come back or basically they just get bored!
Posted by: Andy Stephens 15 Apr 2011
Google Panda
Well, I am as confused as everyone else that is posting negative feedback about the latest Panda Algorithm update. www.companiesandmarkets.com is an aggregator of market research reports. If there is one thing that the Internet should be about, that is 'aggregation'. Google is the world's biggest scraper and aggregator. For specific search terms that are relevant to our industry, we have suddenly dropped from page one, to page 22 in Google.com search results. Traffic has dropped significantly. What is worse, the results that are there are low quality, blogs, little or not content, and even non-English websites. It's highly bizarre. Unless Google reverts soon, we are going to have to change our business practices pretty dramatically. I can see this putting quite a few online operators out of business.
Posted by: Paul Chapman 14 Apr 2011
Google's Farmer (Panda) Update Plowing the Wrong Field
It seems Google is moving away from a scientific approach to the algorithm toward a more subjective system that incorporates social signals. If they really want to improve user experience, they should be expending energy promoting tools like the Chrome Personal Blocklist instead of extrapolating weak data beyond its proper scope. I posted a more in-depth analysis of the problem on today's Experts Exchange Tech News blog, you can read it here: http://www.experts-exchange.com/blogs/EE-Tech-News/B_4549-Google-s-Farmer-Update-II-Plowing-The-Wrong-Field.html
Posted by: Jenn Prentice 14 Apr 2011