26 Mar 2011
Apple started selling its latest small object of desire, the iPad 2, today in Europe and it looks to be even more popular than its predecessor.
There were certainly no people queuing quite as long for the device in the US as was seen at Apple stores in London today, although that may have more to do with the density of Apple stores and traditional British queuing skills, garnished with a sprig of eccentricity.
However, most people aren't keen enough to stand in line and will still be mulling over a purchase in a more sober frame of mind. We've been trying out the iPad 2 for a couple of weeks, and here are our reasons to choose for or against the tablet.
FOR
Honourable Mention: Smart cover
Iain Thomson: OK, this is a bit of a cheat because it's not an out-of-the-box product, but I couldn't resist it - the smart cover is a greater work of genius than the iPad 2 itself.
Some bright spark at Apple no doubt noticed that the iPads you see in public usually have covers. There's the standard grey plastic slip-on cover, while some go for the leather look and I've even seen someone who built the iPad into an actual book. Apple saw a market and decided it could do better than some third-party supplier.
The smart cover attaches to the iPad 2 with magnets, cleans the screen automatically via friction and can be used to turn the device on and off. It's simple in design, functional and it looks great.
But the killer app for me is turning it in on itself and enabling the iPad 2 to be used on a slant as a keyboard. This partially rectifies a major flaw in the original iPad - its lousy virtual keyboard.
A lot of fellow journalists bought iPads when they first came out and it became rather comical watching them trying to type notes on the thing. It was ‘hunt and peck' typing made worse by having the device flat on the desk, and they had no chance of keeping up in a two-hour keynote.
With the smart cover, and the improved keyboard software on the iPad 2, this is a thing of the past. It'll still never be as fast as an actual keyboard - but you can get those too now if you don't mind carrying them - but the smart cover makes all the difference.
Shaun Nichols: One of the problems I've always had with covers for the iPhone and iPad is that they often uglier than the device itself, and actually take away from the appeal of the handset or tablet.
Apple must have noticed the same thing, because the company has stepped up efforts to push its own cover designs with the iPhone 4 and iPad 2. In this case, the smart cover for the iPad.
If you're one of the companies that sells cases for the iPad, you can't be sleeping too well these days. Apple has produced a case that is not only elegant but highly useful. The folding stand options are a brilliant little aspect of the design that could prove highly useful for desktop use as well as FaceTime chat.
5. Beautiful design
Shaun Nichols: If there's one thing you can count with Apple, it's an elegant design. The company is obsessed with creating devices that impress even before they're powered up.
With the iPad 2, the company has managed to take an already lightweight form factor and shave a little bit more. The reduction may only be a matter of millimetres, but the difference when you hold it in your hands is considerable.
The interface is the iOS environment so many have come to know and love. It's so simple that you would think it would be easy to recreate, yet none of the other platforms has managed to come close thus far.
The only reason this wasn't higher on our list is because it was hardly a surprise. Apple always designs nice-looking products and a sleek design for the new iPad was a given.
Iain Thomson: Indeed, this is lower down the list because essentially the iPad 2 is a revision of the classic iPad design, but there are significant improvements.
If you're one of those strange people who buys things and hides them away for 20 years in the hope of making some money you'll probably do OK with the iPad 2, but it won't be as highly prized as the original.
The new model is noticeably thinner than its predecessor and, while it is only slightly lighter, it feels much more portable. The first thing everyone wants to do when they see it is pick it up and feel the heft, and there's no other similar tablet that can beat the iPad 2 in this regard.
A lot of this thinness comes from a redesigned battery pack, which reorders the cells for slimmer configuration. I suspect this is the result of one of the good things about Apple's market dominance - the ability to go to manufacturers and point out that, if they put a bit more effort in, they could sell a lot more hardware.
Latest stories from Tablets
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Flash Developer- Actionscript 3.0, AJAX, JSON, computer...
Business Analyst - Risk platform - Equity Derivatives...
Java Developer - Algorithmic Trading - Global Trading...
Junior Middle Office Project Manager, Treasury, IB...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Flash
Show stopper is no flash. Who wants to browse web sites only to be told video not available, click here to download the plugin. --ha ha Apple says no.
Posted by: Paul 20 May 2011
But there are others very similar.....
A quick look at some of the trading sites of the world are showing some of the new devices that run Android. I have just purchased one, It has the same screen - capacitive, as either of the Ipads have, a processor with speed between the two, the same form factor, a front camera, a great build quality and of course.. around half the price. I`m laughing....... I also junked my Iphone 3gs for an Android device, which is something that actually works.. No more apples for me.
Posted by: vfastbear 22 Apr 2011
But there are others very similar.....
A quick look at some of the trading sites of the world are showing some of the new devices that run Android. I have just purchased one, It has the same screen - capacitive, as either of the Ipads have, a processor with speed between the two, the same form factor, a front camera, a great build quality and of course.. around half the price. I`m laughing....... I also junked my Iphone 3gs for an Android device, which is something that actually works.. No more apples for me.
Posted by: vfastbear 22 Apr 2011
Design!
On your own the Tim! Have you seen the state of the competition?! The design of Dells and HP laptops recently especially.. YUCK.
Posted by: Ben 30 Mar 2011
Against #1 is its terrible pixelation due to low RESOLUTION
Holly....I can not believe that even those who write about iPad -- the supposedly tech drinkers with writing problems -- are the SHEEPLOIDS too. The Against #1 must be its bad RESOLUTION at 130 DPI and the pixelation too annoying and almost not suitable for browsing!!! The iPad has almost the same pixel count as the iPhone4 at 8 times larger surface area ! It's like the times of 1/8 of VGA or a Half of a QuadVGA returned from the oblivion!
Posted by: Raptor 29 Mar 2011
Comments on Facetime
I appreciate the authors comments on the iPad2 and its competitors. However, I want to take exception with their remarks about Facetime. I use my iPhone4, MacBook Pro and now, my new Ipad2 in my business. I regularly give lectures and attend meetings via tvconference. I've used Tandberg, Polycom, Skype, Fring, Tango and several other videoconferencing systems. For simplicity and ease of use, Facetime blows all of them away. It also has better onscreen resolution and seldom pixelated. Sure, with expensive polycom and tandberg systems, I can show myself in video while also sending video of my viewgraphs. However, I've also been using the iPhone 4's front/rear facing cameras to do the same thing, although not simultaneously. I can also easily read slides that someone transmits via the rear-facing camera on the iPad2, so what else would you want? My wife and I also talk to our 1.5 y/o grandson almost once a day using Facetime. He loves it and so do we.. So, I expect the purists will continue to say the cameras aren't good enough, but, packaged with the software and the average network connection's speed, they are much more than adequate.
Posted by: Denny 27 Mar 2011
?
All of the pros can be summed up into: "it's got a webcam and it's more pretty" nothing actually substantial is mentioned there. And the cons should mention "there's no actual difference since the first one"
Posted by: D 26 Mar 2011
Design?
The Apple Design ethic is not beautiful at all. It's absolutely horrible. The silver laptops with an illuminated Fisher Price Apple on the cover. Bleuurgh. I would rather have a ten year old fat Dell Inspiron. I honestly find Mac's design direction fey, bland and unpleasant
Posted by: Tim Staffell 26 Mar 2011