20 Oct 2009
Twitter was accused yesterday of giving Google access to private user accounts, apparently including high-profile micro-bloggers such as former US president Bill Clinton.
Google has been able to crawl through Clinton's tweets and display them in search results, even though Clinton protected his accounts so that only chosen contacts could see his updates, according to a Los Angeles Times blog post.
However, it now appears that the Clinton tweets that Google displayed, which ranged from his thoughts on Hillary Clinton to John Edwards, have come from a fake Clinton account, appropriately named 'notbillclinton'.
Commentators have also said that the other protected accounts to which Google apparently had access were probably not protected when they were first cached by Google.
If Twitter had an agreement in place with Google that allows it to search through all of its tweets, the news would be significant because it would have shown favouritism to Google over its major search rival Microsoft.
Earlier this month it was reported that Twitter was in talks with Google and Microsoft about allowing the search companies to license feeds from the micro-blogging service.
Twitter could not be reached for comment at the time of writing.
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Technical Author - Enfield, North London - £30,000...
.NET Developer (ASP.NET, C#, VB.NET, SSIS, SSRS, C#.NET...
.NET Developer (ASP.NET, VB.NET, C#, VB, C#.NET, dot...
ASP.NET, C# Developer (.NET, C#.NET, dot NET, Web Application...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?