04 Sep 2007
The California state Senate has approved legislation to bar employers from forcing workers to have RFID chips implanted under their skin.
RFID tags have been used for years to identify pets, track inventory and more recently in contactless smartcards and other ID systems.
State Senator Joe Simitian proposed the bill after RFID developer VeriChip was licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration to sell implanted identification devices.
Simitian said that, so far, about 2,000 people have had VeriChip's devices implanted.
"RFID is a minor miracle, with all sorts of good uses," said Simitian. "But we should not condone forced 'tagging' of humans. It is the ultimate invasion of privacy."
Although nine senators opposed the measure, the bill has been approved by the State Assembly and now goes to the governor for his stamp of approval.
Senator Bob Margett, who was one of the people who opposed the bill, said it is premature to legislate on technology that has not yet proved to be a problem.
"It sounded like it was a solution looking for a problem. It didn't seem like it was necessary," he said
Cincinnati video surveillance company CityWatcher.com already requires employees who work in its secure data centre to have a microchip implanted in an attempt to minimise security risks.
Many commentators have praised the move and expressed outrage at the possibility that companies may force employees to have these chips implanted, comparing it to treating staff as animals or inventory.
As well as the privacy issues Simitian said he fears that the devices could be susceptible to hacking and other security problems, facilitating identity theft and improper tracking and surveillance.
Latest stories from Components
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Web Developer LAMP HTML CSS Bash Linux Cambridge...
Drupal / Web Developer ( PHP, Drupal, JavaScript, JQuery...
Web / .NET Developer ( ASP.NET, VB.NET, HTML, CSS, SQL...
Analyst / Developer (Case Management) - NW London - £35...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
I'm not having one of those things in me
I was talking to My Local G.P the other week and we got onto Chipping and I told him " that If He goes to place one of those things in me ,I was going to stab it straight into his eye" Suddenly the subject changed ,,dont know why ..Stuart Australia
Posted by: Stuart 23 Oct 2008
The US Constitution
I am happy to say that "US state bans forced RFID tagging of humans" and that is what "We the People" are saying is good. Thank You All, and God Bless
Posted by: Lauren Donald Haskins Jr. 12 Sep 2007
We the People
If people decide to take the chip that?s one thing, but unfortunately what I?ve been hearing is that the RFID chips are being put in so many things that ?BIG BROTHER? would find a way to link purchases of products to your National ID Card they plan on forcing on us next May. If people don?t care, it is because they are ignorant to the world around them. Read your US Bill of rights and if ?We the People? don?t want them any more, let?s Vote on it, until then let?s uphold them! The End
Posted by: Lauren Donald Haskins Jr. 11 Sep 2007
RFID chip
I'm of course against an implant on anything. The scripture says the Mark of the Beast will be put on or in forhead or hand. I think is takes away our freedoms and treats us like monkeys which I am not. Our freedom of speech is so being threatened and the Bill of Rights. I'm strictly against this and think it ridiculous.
Posted by: P. jean Hogan 11 Sep 2007
Whoops Fred
Admire your protection of civil rights, but 'wake up and smell the coffee'. Did you ever read non-US news? '90% of professing Christians' most certainly do not live in the USA. And huge numbers of non-Christians will oppose human RFID tagging on Civil liberties grounds.
Posted by: Rev Hugh Conkey 11 Sep 2007
Little Resistance
This RFID is a world wide thing and knowing that The USA only constitutes about three percent of the worlds population and ninety percent of all professing Christians live in the USA, how many people have ever heard of the 'Mark Of The Beas'? World wide there will be little resistance to this tagging of humans.
Posted by: Fred J Harris Sr. 08 Sep 2007
Righton Lauren Haskins
I'M with you: Anyone who tries to implant a chip in me or mine will get 80 grains of lead implanted in them--end of story.
Posted by: c. moore 08 Sep 2007
I love the outrage!
I am so glad there are like-minded Americans out there who see how WRONG chipping is for our country! I wouldn't buy a puppy unless the breeder guarenteed she would not be chipped by a vet or otherwise. It's not right for humans period. NO distiction between criminals and free men....don't let the slippery slope start~!!
Posted by: Sara 07 Sep 2007
What happened to this?
This was the 1st post. Orwellian in spades I would lke to meet the person that would try to RFID me, this is the same as barcoding tattos or other types of big brother conduct, I wonder did these people get in line themselves for this chip implant or was that just for the lower class?? Posted by: Mitch, 04 Sep 2007
Posted by: Lauren Donald Haskins Jr. 06 Sep 2007
RFID and privacy
I do think RFID is a great technology, it does a lot good in many way and change the way people doing bussiness, but when it comes to privacy problem, I think, with some laws and measures in place, it can be solved.
Posted by: susanzheng 05 Sep 2007
Mark of the Beast
First of all it is against the US Bill of Rights not to mention (but I will) something that has been in the Bible long before the Bill of Rights. "And he shall make all, both little and great, rich and poor, freemen and bondmen, to have a character in their right hand or on their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, but he that hath the character, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."
Posted by: Lauren Donald Haskins Jr. 05 Sep 2007
Hey, susanzheng
The US CONSTITUTION is what You should read. I will stand up to ANYONE that thinks they can put a chip in me and that means even if I have to exercise my 2nd Amendment.
Posted by: Lauren Donald Haskins Jr. 05 Sep 2007
Orwellian in spades
I would lke to meet the person that would try to RFID me, this is the same as barcoding tattos or other types of big brother conduct, I wonder did these people get in line themselves for this chip implant or was that just for the lower class??
Posted by: Mitch 04 Sep 2007