24 Nov 1999
In an open letter to Collier, chairman of the General Practitioners' Board John Malthouse said the council meeting agenda was too extensive and council members would be called to debate and decide on research findings they had not yet seen.
In a strongly worded letter, Malthouse said: 'There is a view that council members are not being provided with timely and comprehensive information.
'They cannot, therefore, hold a proper and informed debate - and certainly not in the timescale apparently afforded. In the view of some members the present approach is tantamount to a contempt of council and is intolerable.'
Malthouse said the items under discussion in the institute's reform agenda should be put back from the December council meeting and that a discussion of all items under review be held at the council conference in January.
The institute said president Sheila Masters has written to council members saying that detailed research papers would be considered at the January council conference.
Latest stories from Services
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Our client a global Investment Bank based in the city...
VB.Net Developer / Software Developer - West Midlands...
Project Manager - Risk - Finance Reporting - Finance...
Project Manager - Finance IT - General Ledger/Subledger...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?