10 Nov 2006
Two Australian medical researchers writing in the British Medical Journal have urged doctors to use Google to help diagnose rare illnesses in patients.
The conclusion is based on research which showed that Google could provide a reasonable degree of accuracy, correctly diagnosing 15 of 26 cases published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2005.
"Useful information on even the rarest medical syndromes can now be found and digested within a matter of minutes," said the article by Hangwi Tang and Jennifer Hwee Kwoon Ng from the Department of Rheumatology at the Princess Alexandra Hospital in Queensland.
"Our study suggests that, in difficult diagnostic cases, it is often useful to Google for a diagnosis. Search engines such as Google are becoming the latest tools in clinical medicine, and doctors in training need to become proficient in their use."
Tang and Ng are not suggesting that patients self-diagnose using Google, but claim that the search engine can give a doctor an important edge, quoting anecdotal and statistical evidence.
"Patients may find the search less efficient and be less likely to reach the correct diagnosis," said the researchers.
"We believe that Google searches by a human expert (a doctor) have a better yield, as Google is exceedingly good at finding documents with co-occurrence of the signs/symptoms used as search terms, and human experts are efficient in selecting relevant documents."
Use of Google to search for medical conditions by an amateur can yield confusing results, vnunet.com found. Typing 'severe chest pain' into the advanced search facility results in about 1.6 million hits.
Among the first 10 is Family Doctor, which provides a decision tree that yields 14 different outcomes for severe chest pain, ranging from heart attack (recommended course of action: contact emergency services) to hyperventilation (lie down and relax).
Also in the first 10 hits, Wrong Diagnosis provides a list of nearly 100 conditions that can cause chest pain, from asbestosis to a bacterial digestive infection known as Whipple's disease.
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Our global consultancy client currently seeks a number...
Support Analyst x 1/2 Skills: Apple Mac OSX, Windows...
Network Consultant - London - 55-65k My client are...
A leading global provider of critical information to...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Have you noticed the refinements that Google offers for Health?
Maybe you guys are missing something when you say that a user can be confused by Google health results. Have you not noticed the refinements that are offered up by Google when you type in something like Malaria, Diabetes, Hepatitis, etc. - they immediately bring up Treatments, Symptoms, etc. - even For Doctors. Clicking on these narrows down the search results to provide exactly these kind of information. These refinements are created by a product called Google Coop, where large medicine and health providers are collaborating to make the search experience on health better for both patients and doctors. I have found it so useful, that I have told all my friends and doctors about about it, and they love it too. Arguably this is the most effective search feature that Google has offered.
Posted by: Anne Klum 10 Nov 2006