13 Sep 2008
The Virginia supreme court has overturned the conviction of infamous spammer Jeremy Jaynes.
Jaynes had been convicted in 2005 of violating the state's anti-spam law, which prohibited the sending of unsolicited bulk emails.
At the time of his arrest, the North Carolina resident was said to be among the world's 10 most prolific spammers, allegedly sending some 10 million emails every day through AOL email servers.
Jaynes conviction gained national attention because it was the first such conviction for a spammer. Since then, several other so-called "spam kings" have been charged or sued for their actions.
In May, a court had rejected Jaynes's appeal by a narrow margin. The latest decision, however, reverses the conviction and overturns the 2003 law.
The judges ruled that because the law does not discern between commercial and other forms of mass email, it places an unconstitutional restriction on free speech.
"That statute is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face because it prohibits the anonymous transmission of all unsolicited bulk emails including those containing political, religious or other speech protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution," the court said in its ruling. "Accordingly, we will reverse the judgment."
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Overview: My client; Based in the City...
**New Vacancy** Based in London Up to £35,000 - £42...
Junior BA The role of the junior BA is to support the...
Project Manager - Financial Services IT - up to £85'000...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
a victory for freedom
It is always easy to find good reasons to curtail Freedom of Speech; kudos to this court.
Posted by: Mike J 14 Sep 2008