05 Sep 2007
The International Standards Organization (ISO) has voted against Microsoft's Office Open XML standard.
Votes were cast by ISO member bodies and 41 participating members from 104 countries. The procedure required a 66 per cent share of 'yes' votes from the national bodies and no more than 25 per cent opposing ballots.
Microsoft failed to meet both criteria, with 53 per cent of votes in favour and 26 per cent against. Members could also abstain.
The software developer had requested that the body fast-tracked the application, which would have allowed it to become an official standard by next year.
Microsoft now has the opportunity to address the objections at a meeting in February and seek consensus on possible modifications. The national bodies will then be able to withdraw their negative votes and pass the proposal.
If no compromise can be made, the fast-track procedure will be terminated. Microsoft will still be able to submit the standard under the normal standards development rules, but this will take more time than the fast-track procedure.
The defeat is a major set-back for Microsoft as it is attempting to keep control over the market for productivity suites. Prior to ISO releasing the results of the vote, Microsoft had issued a press release claiming " strong" global support.
The period leading up to the vote had been marked by strong lobbying from Microsoft, as well as opponents led by IBM.
Organisations are increasingly demanding that software supports open formats that allow multiple applications to open, edit and save documents without requiring licence fees.
A closed standard forces a lock-in with a single vendor and prevents documents from being accessed in the future when a certain technology has been discontinued.
Microsoft argues that its standard is more mature than the rival Open Document Format (ODF). But many counter that ODF is well suited to the job and that there is no need for two standards.
Some critics also have raised concerns about Microsoft's control over the standard, even though the ISO ratification would ensure its independence.
Latest stories from Open Source
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Firm also discusses Blackberry 10 system
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Software Project Manager, Bristol, up to £35k Want...
Front-end Developer / Web Developer - Tech Start...
Senior Ruby on Rails Developer - Leading Financial Technology...
MS CRM / Dynamics CRM Lead Technical Consultant, £58...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
IBM Dinasaur
Just unable to compete and calling in the politiacal chips to hang on to that old technology.
Posted by: Bob Busam 05 Sep 2007
Microsoft Seeks Control
It is well known that Microsoft wants to use its own "Open XML" format because it can then use this to claim open standards, and then to wrap its proprietary formats within. This results in a closed standard with an open standard badge. I guess they want to fast track the standard to steal a march on the ODF cause and reduce scrutiny at too much detail. Great businesses if you can get it.
Posted by: Chris Ball 05 Sep 2007
Why to not let MS have its way.
Microsoft would rather spend the time making the world conform to what it already has than to spend the money to conform to a standard it hasn't worked on itself. And although approving the Microsoft open standard 'ensures its independence', given Microsoft's past tactics in suddenly creating very proprietary formats, I'd be very careful in approving anything generated by Microsoft for use in any business application.
Posted by: Phillip Campbell 04 Sep 2007
Good
I'm not anti-Microsoft, in fact I do a lot of development using MS products, but standards should not origionate from corporations. I undrstand that in theory the ISO process should eliminate much in the way of problems, but still, there is no need for this. Stick to ODF, ro improve ODF, but keep the standards truely neutral, not the domain of corproations.
Posted by: Bob 04 Sep 2007
What a mis-leading headline!
Open XML defeated? I thought the vote was just for fast-tracking. But perhaps you are right, and OXML has been defeated. What a confusing article.
Posted by: Steve 04 Sep 2007