All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis

Watch what you say online

by Dinah Greek

10 Jul 2003

Be the first to comment

  • Tweet this

Joan Brownlee (not her real name) wrote to me asking how she could deal with what she considered to be libellous postings about her on a website.

She is a member of a site where people write reviews about products, and she said her reviews had often won praise.

But she claims a couple of people disagreed and started posting messages accusing her of plagiarism on a forum for members of the site - one unrelated to the original website.

Mrs Brownlee came to me because she felt she couldn't get anyone from the forum website to listen to her concerns.

She gave me the web address of both the site she sometimes writes for and the web forum where she said the messages had been posted.

I looked at the forum but could not find any of the messages that were upsetting her, so the person who hosts the site may have taken them down.

I also talked to the people at Ciao.co.uk, the website where she posts her reviews, and they were very concerned about the problem. But as they have nothing to do with the forum where the messages were posted there was nothing they could do.

They pointed out that if someone posted libellous or offensive comments on their site they would remove the messages and probably the membership of the writer, and the site states this clearly in its terms and conditions of membership.

"We are very strict about this and if we saw any evidence on our websites we would deal with it immediately," said Max Cartellieri, the managing director of Ciao AG, the company that runs the site.

But I was unable to take the matter further because Mrs Brownlee was so upset by the messages that she asked me not to pursue the case.

"I am worried that if I do take matters further the situation will only get worse and I couldn't face that," she said.

Mrs Brownlee is not alone and people should realise there is redress.

Taking the legal route should always be a last resort as the process can be daunting and expensive.

Most companies that host websites don't want to be associated with this type of behaviour. If they don't react promptly to complaints they could be liable for damages if defamation can be proved.

"I find that writing to the hosting company or owner of the site telling them to remove the offending message works wonders," said Jon Fell, a partner in law firm Masons.

A defamatory statement is one that tends to lower a person in the estimation of right thinking members of society generally or to cause him or her to be shunned or avoided.

If a posting exposes the person to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or disparages them in their profession, calling or business, it is also considered defamatory.

Do you agree?

 

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions. Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Poll

Flame virus poll

Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?

34%

1%

11%

54%

Connect with V3.co.uk

Sign up to our daily or weekly newsletters

Symanteccloud

Social networking: a guide for IT managers

Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them

Riverbed

Mitigating the risks of IT change

The importance of understanding your infrastructure

Credit Risk Modeller, SAS, London, £50,000

Credit Risk Modeller, SAS, London, £50,000 Title- Credit...

Global Project/Programme Manager-with recruitment deployment experienc

My London client is looking for an experienced Programme...

PHP Developers (All Levels)

My leading client is looking for a number of excellent...

Group Services Manager - Telecoms

My client, a leading international name in Manufacturing...

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.