31 Jan 2007
Priceline.com, Travelocity.com and Cingular Wireless have agreed to pay a fine for advertising through an illegal adware application.
The companies had purchased advertisements on DirectRevenue, a notorious maker of adware that is the target of a separate lawsuit for fraudulent software installations and serving illegal pop-up ads.
The fines of $30,000 to $35,000 settle a lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.
"Advertisers will now be held responsible when their ads end up on consumers' computers without full notice and consent," said Cuomo.
Companies whose banner ads show up on adware networks often hide behind the premise that they outsourced the media buying to 'outsiders'. Cuomo warned, however, that he will hold the advertiser responsible nonetheless.
"Advertisers can no longer insulate themselves from liability by turning a blind eye to how their advertisements are delivered, or by placing ads through intermediaries such as media buyers," he stated.
"New Yorkers have suffered enough with unwanted adware programs and this agreement goes a long way toward clamping down on this odious practice."
Anti-adware activists published a list last year containing the names of 12 vendors that had funded adware operations for a DirectRevenue competitor. Three of the named vendors subsequently cut their ties with the company in question.
Adware is designed to serve advertisements to the user, often through pop-ups, and is based on the sites that a user visits. The software typically collects information on surfing habits.
Such software is controversial because it uses deceptive practices to get itself installed. Adware distributors often cloud the true intentions of their applications, which often come bundled with free games or other software.
Botnet operators are also known to install adware on computers in their networks because the adware distributors offer money for each installation.
Adware vendor Zango paid a $3m fine last year to settle charges over illegal software installations and ambiguous end-user licence agreements.
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
A senior C# developer is required by a leading investment...
A senior JAVA developer is required by a leading financial...
A leading investment bank are looking for an AGILE JAVA...
A senior C# WPF F# developer is required by a leading...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Priceline malware
So what, $35K to priceline is nothing. But to people who get their mal/ad/ware in their machines typically have to buy decent ad/mal/spyware removal programs. These companys should also have to create a program that removes their 'ware' from your machine. That program should be free and available from a trusted 3rd party. But the company must also place a prominent notice on their site and a link to the FREE remover.
Posted by: Withheld 13 Jun 2007