03 Sep 2009
Oracle could be in for a rough ride from European regulators over its purchase of Sun Microsystems, after the EU Competition Commission said that the deal could be bad for open source.
The Commission said in a statement that it has opened an in-depth investigation into the planned acquisition under EU merger regulations.
An initial market investigation indicated that the proposed deal raised serious doubts about its compatibility with the single market, suggesting that the EU is worried that Oracle might have too much control over the database market.
The Commission said that it is not prejudging the matter, and will not make a ruling until it has the final results of its investigation. The organisation has 90 working days or until 19 January to present a report.
EU Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said that the Commission has to examine very carefully the effects on competition in Europe when the world's leading proprietary database company proposes to take over the world's leading open source database company.
Kroes is worried that customers would face reduced choices or higher prices as a result of the takeover.
Since databases are a key element of public and business IT systems, the Oracle move could affect the European economy, particularly when economic conditions are fragile.
If a merged Oracle-Sun decided to walk away from open source, the EU could be left without cost-effective IT solutions and systems based on open-source software, according to Kroes.
"The Commission has to ensure that such alternatives would continue to be available," she said.
The EU feels that the database market is highly concentrated, in that the three main competitors in proprietary databases - Oracle, IBM and Microsoft - control 85 per cent of the market.
Oracle is the market leader in proprietary databases, while Sun's MySQL is the leading open source database.
The Commission's preliminary market investigation has shown that the Oracle and Sun databases compete directly in many sectors of the market, and that MySQL is widely expected to represent a greater competitive constraint as it becomes increasingly functional, Kroes said.
The Commission's investigation has also shown that the open source nature of Sun's MySQL might not eliminate fully the potential for anti-competitive effects.
Kroes concluded that the Commission's in-depth investigation will need to look at Oracle's incentive to further develop MySQL as an open-source database.
Latest stories from Management
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Firm also discusses Blackberry 10 system
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
My client based in Basingstoke are currently recruiting...
Digital Service Delivery Manager Public Sector / NHS...
C#, ASP.Net, .Net 3.5, LinQ, Design Patterns, Nunit...
TEST MANAGER (Edinburgh or Glasgow) Harvey Nash's...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
HA HA it isn't about antitrust
This isn't about EU protecting us from antitrust. The mysql database has already been forked and at best it represents 4% of the market. MYSQL is competition for Microsoft not Oracle. It is primarily used in small rollouts. Oracle is used in massive clustered databses. I think it is all about Siemens, MS, IBM, and HP paying off EU so they can gain marketshare.
Posted by: hrldcain 22 Oct 2009
Thank goodness for EU!
Antitrust regulation in the US is a JOKE. The people in power here have had their pockets lined by lobbyists since day one. Unfortunately, that's more the rule than the exception these days. There was no chance for blockage of this monopolistic merger domestically. There were NO voices to be heard on the issue of MySQL. For the most part, the powers that be don't understand technology at a level sufficient to comprehend the impact. I hope EU doesn't fall prey to the same kind of corrupt influence. A merger between Sun and Oracle is wrong on so many counts, but especially so with regard to control over MySQL. Oracle will, without a doubt, put every effort into subduing any further development on MySQL, especially in areas where it competes directly with new technology offered in it's own RDMS. Over time, that will make MySQL obsolete and eventually it will be abandoned because Oracle will always control rights to the existing source code. We've already seen this strategy work well with Adobe/Macromedia's acquisition and de-commissioning of open source competitors to it's Flash Generator product. "If you can't beat 'em, buy 'em"
Posted by: Someone With A Clue 03 Sep 2009