10 Apr 2008
Internet service providers (ISPs) are asking the BBC to fund network upgrades to cope with the popularity of the iPlayer viewing system.
The stunning success of the BBC iPlayer has seen one million programmes watched online every month, but now ISPs are claiming that the increased traffic is overloading broadband networks and they want the BBC to contribute to the costs of upgrades.
"The question is about whether we invest in extra capacity or go to the consumer and ask them to pay a BBC tax," said Simon Gunter, from ISP Tiscali.
Ofcom estimates that the cost of network upgrades could rise as high as £830m, predominantly because the UK broadband infrastructure is still built around copper rather than fibre optic cabling.
But some are claiming that this row over the iPlayer is a ploy by ISPs to get public funding for network upgrades. Michael Phillips, from broadband comparison service broadbandchoices.co.uk, said the problems have arisen because ISPs underestimated the amount of downloading customers would do.
"The iPlayer has come along and made downloading a legal and mass market activity," he said.
"They have priced themselves as cheaply as possible on the assumption that people were just going to use email and do a bit of web surfing,"
Latest stories from Networks
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Desktop Deployment Support Analyst (Worksite, SQL...
Project Manager is required by Bank in Germany Suitable...
Mobile & Social Media Application Web Developer...
CCVP Consultant - Telecoms Cisco Certified Voice Professional...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Not in the BBC's remit?
I don't think the BBC should have to pay for consumer reception of it's services. It must create content and broadcast it to as many license fee payers as possible. But, to compare internet TV to ordinary TV, the BBC does not have to buy a TV or a freeview box for everyone who wants to watch; that is the user's responsibility. The difficulty arises because the ISP's are a new middleman in the system, and they have chosen a business model which did not anticipate the arrival of internet media.
Posted by: Alastair Mailer 11 Apr 2008
isp ,s oversubscibed
maybe if the isp companys were not so greedy in allowing too many subscribers aboard thier sinking ships they would be able to cope. on the other hand as lots are oversubscibed,and have been for ages maybe they could chanel the extra income to funding improvements themselves .....
Posted by: del 10 Apr 2008
Now they take notice
Now the ISP's are realising that we need to improve infastructure just from the use of one thing where a few months back they were saying their is no need for improvements for a long time yet as the consumer doesn't use the capacity. They just don't want to spend the money themselves.
Posted by: fuzzchopz 10 Apr 2008
PAY for what you use
Why should tax payers pay for ISP upgrades, if the isp's want more revenue they should charge the people who are downloading.
Posted by: Neil 10 Apr 2008
Why only BBC?
I'm unsure why it's the BBC that should pay so much when there are so many sites that do very similar things - MTV.com, HBO.com, YouTube.com - surely all heavy user networks should contirbute?
Posted by: Jon 10 Apr 2008
How about a 'road tax' scheme??
We all pay road tax, a fee based upon our usage of public highways, how about a similar scheme where content providers pay a fee towards the maintenance of the internet infrastructure? Just as HGVs pay higher road tax, providers such as the BBC would pay more for making streaming/downloadable video available. I'll leave it to others to iron out the fine detail of how this would be implemented!! If it does get used then the idea is (c) me!!
Posted by: Steve Jones 10 Apr 2008