24 Oct 2009
2.
Windows NT 4.0
Iain Thomson: Windows NT 4.0 was Microsoft at its best, and
it's still its only system that IT administrators can talk about with genuine
pleasure.
It was a system built by techies for techies. Admittedly Windows 2000 took the software to new levels, but NT was the system that IT administrators of my era love to talk about, both with affection and a small amount of malice.
NT was a boon to running an office. For the first time it made running a large number of clients in an office easy - not as easy as some would have liked but a hell of a lot better than things had been before. Windows 2000 was flashier but, for those schooled on a command line interface, it was the first GUI-based system that actually worked.
Shaun Nichols: One of the smartest things Microsoft ever did was fold Windows NT into the regular operating system in Windows 2000.
NT was everything other versions of Windows were not: it was far more stable, practical and easier to administer than any previous version of Windows had been. As Iain noted, it was also a darling of system administrators, and it's a safe bet that many IT departments still speak reverently of Windows NT.
NT was also Microsoft's foray into a market that had previously been occupied by Unix. It was designed to be the enterprise complement to the Windows 9x family. To that end, you can make a solid case that NT is also a precursor to the Windows Server family.
Given that Microsoft simply isn't Microsoft without the two versions of Windows, I don't think it's a stretch to say that NT was the most important family of Windows, perhaps ever, and as the most famous edition NT 4.0 gets top billing.
1.
Windows Update
Shaun Nichols: It's rare for a software vendor to get an
application completely right the first time out. Errors get overlooked,
vulnerabilities go unnoticed and compatibility issued get pointed out with every
product. Microsoft seems to have a certain knack for putting out products that
need a few revisions to really hit their stride.
Aside from that, Microsoft products are by far the most popular targets in the world for malware attacks. With the overwhelming majority of users running the company's products, a Windows or Office attack is far and away the best method for infecting a lot of users.
These two factors combined make it of vital importance that the company had an efficient method for distributing patches and updates. And with Windows 98, the company delivered what might have been the most important pieces of security software since Dr. Soloman first bundled his anti-virus tools.
Windows Update allows the company to automatically send out updates to users with minimal effort on the consumer's part. Vital updates and patches are downloaded automatically and installed quickly.
While this seems boring, imagine a world without it. Users would be forced to download updates from a web site or launch an updater application, and many systems would remain unpatched for years at a time. Malware writers would be like lions in a petting zoo.
Iain Thomson: We argued about this one a lot, and it says much about Microsoft's products that this got the number one spot. but while Windows Update is good news for consumers I wonder whether IT administrators like it quite as much.
As Shaun pointed out, malware writers love Windows because it's a huge target. Back in the day when malware writers worked for kudos not money, Microsoft was a high value target, but the monetisation of malware has made it even more so. So now Microsoft pushes fixes down to users rather than waiting for them to be installed.
This is a great boon to the non-technical user who makes up the vast majority of Microsoft's user base. But for IT administrators it's a less clear cut option. While patching is the aim, IT staff generally like to test patches first to make sure they don't crash the system. I know of a couple of instances where patches have caused huge problems with legacy software.
That said, Windows Update remains a really useful idea, and one that other software companies are also using. If you have a Mozilla browser you get sent updates automatically, for example. It's a good system and something we need to see more of.
Latest stories from Operating Systems
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Lead PHP Developer - Technical Architect - Ecommerce...
C# Software Engineers required to join rapidly expanding...
Java / J2EE Software Engineers required to join rapidly...
Developer (MIS / Business Systems - SQL / T-SQL, HTML...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
No visual studio?
remember, visual basic made programming simpler for many, and its visual studio.net is best ide at present ! it should be given first place!!
Posted by: shivkumar 12 Nov 2009
Windows 2000 forgotten???
I think you guys missed the mark with this one. Windows 2000 was the plug and play simplicity in Windows 98 with the stability and reliability of Windows NT 4.0 rolled into one product. Microsoft also introduced Active Directory (Microsoft's NDS) with the debut of Windows 2000 Server. I love Windows XP, but I believe that Windows 2000 was a lot more revolutionary than some of the other products on the list.
Posted by: Godzilla 10 Nov 2009
Time lines etc
I have been in to PC's since teh first XT. Although I did enjoy your list, time lines and releases are not adding up. Not sure if this was done due to space limitations or what.
Posted by: Charles Walton 09 Nov 2009
Caught in your own act!
David McElroy, you are asking for a legit source, where is your legit source? This is like accusing someone for doing something you are doing. Iain & Shaun, you mentioned that "Microsoft seems to have a certain knack for putting out products that need a few revisions to really hit their stride.", tell me a company that doesn't. From my understanding of product development, products are released and modifications made based on feedback. So i dont know any company that has come out with a product that did not see the need to revise/improve. With #1 being windows update, looks to me like you guys are just everyday technology users without a real fundamental understand of the workings of technology. Yes I said it. I mean you have office 2000 on there because you like it. If that is the case, you should name the article: My Top 10 best releases from Microsoft.
Posted by: taz 07 Nov 2009
Where is Vista?
I think Vista is the best system from Microsoft, the second after 7.
Posted by: wiwi_eu 03 Nov 2009
You forgot Dos 6.2
Hi, You forgot the best MS-Dos version, the one just before XP and the last with the text mode C:\
Posted by: Marc. 02 Nov 2009
Sharepoint, OCS
I would expect to have Microsoft Office Sharepoint Server and Office Communicator Server in the top 10. These are top notch succesfull MSFT products enabeling business users to collaborate in the broad sense of the world.
Posted by: Ralph Neuburger 31 Oct 2009
Don't take MS prisoner
@David McElroy - Microsoft never wanted to be painted the monopolist bully that it is. The Apple 'investment' and the subsequent 'investment' in Sun Micro showed their true intentions. Which is, Microsoft wanted to avoid being the target of government anti-trust actions. Being a monopolist bully 99% of time and a softie deek 1% does not make MS the victims of a patent dispute. And MS would have dragged out the court cases until Apple ceased to exist by draining away all its money through legal fees. How much money did the US gov't waste in legal fees against MS - did we even recoup the costs in the settlement?
Posted by: yellowfury 31 Oct 2009
Gates the pilot?
If Bill Gates is so fascinated with Flight Sims, why did he go and shut down the development studio when they were doing such a good job on MS Flight Sim?
Posted by: Pete 29 Oct 2009
No Visual Studio?!?
In my opinion, Visual Studio is the one of the best IDEs around.
Posted by: mcclanahoochie 28 Oct 2009
Your comments about Office for Mac are VERY wrong
Microsoft Office never left the Mac. The deal between Apple and Microsoft merely guaranteed a continuation of the product for another five years. That was a time when a lot of people were WONDERING whether Microsoft (and other software vendors) might cut back on Mac support, so the deal had symbolic importance in reassuring buyers that they were still going to have access to MS Office when they bought Macs. There are other aspects of that deal that don't get mentioned very often. Everybody ASSUMES that the investment was the real issue for Apple -- that Microsoft "saved" Apple with the cash infusion. Can you give me ANY legit source for that legend? I don't think so. People who were "in the know" at the time claimed that the matter was much more complex. Apple had a number of claims against Microsoft for infringing various patents. That issue was quietly resolved as a part of this deal. My understanding is that the money that Apple got (for "preferred stock," with no voting rights, which Microsoft subsequently sold for a large profit) was really compensation that the companies agreed to for Apple's claims. But Apple got to spin it as a huge vote of confidence from its biggest competitor (by structuring the deal as an alleged investment), which reassured people that Apple wasn't going out of business anytime soon. Microsoft got two things out of the deal. First, the patent disputes were resolved quietly AND Apple agreed to ship IE as the default browser on the Mac, displacing Netscape. Remember that winning market share was still a HUGE deal for Microsoft at the time. (This was before Safari existed, of course.) BTW, if Apple hadn't had the leverage of patent issues to hold over Microsoft's head, what possible reason would there have been for Microsoft to do the deal? The usual one trotted out is that Microsoft was trying to prop up a competitor to avoid anti-trust issues, but that doesn't make sense, mostly because something like that would have been COMPLETELY at odds with Microsoft's "take no prisoners" approach at the time. So both companies got what they wanted, but there was much more to the story than the simplistic version that you're presenting here. And the part about Office having been gone from the Mac platform was just flat-out wrong in every way.
Posted by: David McElroy 28 Oct 2009
Another Honourable Mention
I would've given a vote to Autoroute 2007. I found it in a shop in Bangkok in 2007 and still find it brilliant. Only now are the GPS systems getting close. It can still design a route with many different waypoints much better than ViaMichelin or the GPS's and running it on an EeePC is great.
Posted by: Harry Cadle 28 Oct 2009
You missed something important!!
You've forgotten Microsoft most important release EVER - The Xbox 360!
Posted by: Richard 28 Oct 2009
Windows Update Number 1 ????????
When an update system is your number one product something is wrong. I mean its not even an application, well not an application in the normal sense of applications. I dont agree with Internet Explorer 7 even being in the list, as its still a massive malware vector which even the police are recommending you dont use to do internet banking with. It also crashes regularly and is very user unfriendly. Anyway youve got guts to expose your fondness for an aggressive monopolistic bully.
Posted by: man o man 28 Oct 2009
only found 1
dos 5 yes, the rest neeeh. MS is product wise such a boring company.
Posted by: Species8472 27 Oct 2009
That's why there is WSUS
"While patching is the aim, the IT staff generally like to test out patches first to make sure they don't crash the system. " That is why there is WSUS. You point your Windows Update to your corporate WSUS server and IT can approve updates on their own schedule while using the auto-install functionality.
Posted by: Scott 26 Oct 2009
No Visual Studio
I would have thought 2008 would be in there somewhere. The de-facto fully integrated development environment.
Posted by: Sym 26 Oct 2009