24 Oct 2009
Microsoft released the latest version of Windows this week. The company promises that Windows 7 will be the best version of its operating system yet, and hopes that the release will go much further than its predecessor, Windows Vista. We can only hope so, since Vista was such a poor example of what could be done.
Whether Windows 7 does go down as one of Microsoft's best remains to be seen, which is why you won't see it on this list. While some of us have high hopes for the operating system, the old rule that you never buy version one of any Microsoft code holds true. We have yet to see what pitfalls occur, and they will only become apparent once widespread adoption kicks in.
But in the meantime we've decided to count down the 10 best products ever to come out of Redmond. This was a very tough list to come up with, since neither Shaun nor I are Microsoft's biggest fans, but we think this gives a good example of some of the best that Microsoft has to offer.
Honourable
mention: OneNote
Shaun Nichols: OneNote only made 'honourable mention' because
it is largely a niche product, but if you're a student, journalist or just a
tablet PC user, OneNote can be a valuable tool. Far more than just a word
processor, OneNote is an application explicitly designed for note-taking.
Most importantly, OneNote allows users to link text notes with recorded audio. Users can click on a specific line of text or a note and hear audio of what was being said while that note was typed.
For me, OneNote changes the way I approach an interview or keynote address, replacing endless typing with simple notes to sound clips, allowing me to pay much closer attention to what's actually being said rather than making sure I got that last quote right.
Iain Thomson: OK, we're perhaps a bit biased on this one. OneNote is such a great tool for journalists that we almost suspect Microsoft developed it just to get good press.
Nevertheless, it's a stunningly useful application for anyone who needs to take notes in a meeting. If you sit through presentations and need an accurate record of what went on, OneNote is your application. It makes the whole process much more effective and allows you to keep an accurate record of what went on.
This is useful more than one reason. The next time management asks 'Which idiot decided to do this?' you have a ready-made record proving it wasn't you.
Honourable
mention: Flight Simulator
Iain Thomson: It's going to date me but the Flight
Simulator program was probably the first game I played on an IBM PC back in
the 1980s.
Microsoft apparently started selling the game because Bill Gates was fascinated with flight simulators. Since he has yet to get a private pilot's licence I have my doubts, but there's no denying that this has to be Microsoft's longest running game program, since it predates Windows.
Now, as it's sold by Microsoft you'd expect the game to be pretty awful but in fact it was very, very good for its time. There were a few bugs - some of them very enjoyable. You could choose the Lear jet and take it up to maximum ceiling before switching to a biplane and power-diving down to its maximum altitude in a way that would rip the wings off an actual plane.
However, the simulator also attracted some seriously geeky fans. I know of people who actually make flights in real time, travelling from London to Barcelona, for example, without fast forwarding through the boring flying through France business. One former journalist, who shall remain nameless, even bought a pilot's cap to wear while he was playing. Sad? Yes, but you can't deny the power of the program.
Shaun Nichols: The devoted followers of games such as Halo and Call of Duty are well known, and here in the US the Madden NFL franchise is so popular it was given its own TV show, but flight simulators is a huge niche that doesn't often get noticed.
Perhaps it's because flight simulator addicts aren't the grungy university students or twitchy gamer types that you see with other games; they are quiet, reserved types and quite often white-collar professionals.
That doesn't mean they aren't very, very into their game of choice. The hardcore types not only spend long hours with force-feedback joysticks, many opt to go even further and set up multiple monitors, driving wheels and even foot pedals to more accurately recreate the act of taking off into the wild blue yonder.
We can't all be Richard Branson or Sergey Brin, and most of us will never be able to get behind the wheel of a private jet, so Flight Simulator is not too bad for the next best thing.
Latest stories from Operating Systems
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
EU data protection overhaul contains "bureaucratic tick box-proposals", says information commissioner Christopher Graham in exclusive interview with V3
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
INSIDE SALES / BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT WEST LONDON...
QA Tester | Peterborough, Cambridgeshire...
TECHNICAL SALES / ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE / WEST LONDON / MARKET...
TECHNICAL SALES / BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT WEST LONDON...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
No visual studio?
remember, visual basic made programming simpler for many, and its visual studio.net is best ide at present ! it should be given first place!!
Posted by: shivkumar 12 Nov 2009
Windows 2000 forgotten???
I think you guys missed the mark with this one. Windows 2000 was the plug and play simplicity in Windows 98 with the stability and reliability of Windows NT 4.0 rolled into one product. Microsoft also introduced Active Directory (Microsoft's NDS) with the debut of Windows 2000 Server. I love Windows XP, but I believe that Windows 2000 was a lot more revolutionary than some of the other products on the list.
Posted by: Godzilla 10 Nov 2009
Time lines etc
I have been in to PC's since teh first XT. Although I did enjoy your list, time lines and releases are not adding up. Not sure if this was done due to space limitations or what.
Posted by: Charles Walton 09 Nov 2009
Caught in your own act!
David McElroy, you are asking for a legit source, where is your legit source? This is like accusing someone for doing something you are doing. Iain & Shaun, you mentioned that "Microsoft seems to have a certain knack for putting out products that need a few revisions to really hit their stride.", tell me a company that doesn't. From my understanding of product development, products are released and modifications made based on feedback. So i dont know any company that has come out with a product that did not see the need to revise/improve. With #1 being windows update, looks to me like you guys are just everyday technology users without a real fundamental understand of the workings of technology. Yes I said it. I mean you have office 2000 on there because you like it. If that is the case, you should name the article: My Top 10 best releases from Microsoft.
Posted by: taz 07 Nov 2009
Where is Vista?
I think Vista is the best system from Microsoft, the second after 7.
Posted by: wiwi_eu 03 Nov 2009
You forgot Dos 6.2
Hi, You forgot the best MS-Dos version, the one just before XP and the last with the text mode C:\
Posted by: Marc. 02 Nov 2009
Sharepoint, OCS
I would expect to have Microsoft Office Sharepoint Server and Office Communicator Server in the top 10. These are top notch succesfull MSFT products enabeling business users to collaborate in the broad sense of the world.
Posted by: Ralph Neuburger 31 Oct 2009
Don't take MS prisoner
@David McElroy - Microsoft never wanted to be painted the monopolist bully that it is. The Apple 'investment' and the subsequent 'investment' in Sun Micro showed their true intentions. Which is, Microsoft wanted to avoid being the target of government anti-trust actions. Being a monopolist bully 99% of time and a softie deek 1% does not make MS the victims of a patent dispute. And MS would have dragged out the court cases until Apple ceased to exist by draining away all its money through legal fees. How much money did the US gov't waste in legal fees against MS - did we even recoup the costs in the settlement?
Posted by: yellowfury 31 Oct 2009
Gates the pilot?
If Bill Gates is so fascinated with Flight Sims, why did he go and shut down the development studio when they were doing such a good job on MS Flight Sim?
Posted by: Pete 29 Oct 2009
No Visual Studio?!?
In my opinion, Visual Studio is the one of the best IDEs around.
Posted by: mcclanahoochie 28 Oct 2009
Your comments about Office for Mac are VERY wrong
Microsoft Office never left the Mac. The deal between Apple and Microsoft merely guaranteed a continuation of the product for another five years. That was a time when a lot of people were WONDERING whether Microsoft (and other software vendors) might cut back on Mac support, so the deal had symbolic importance in reassuring buyers that they were still going to have access to MS Office when they bought Macs. There are other aspects of that deal that don't get mentioned very often. Everybody ASSUMES that the investment was the real issue for Apple -- that Microsoft "saved" Apple with the cash infusion. Can you give me ANY legit source for that legend? I don't think so. People who were "in the know" at the time claimed that the matter was much more complex. Apple had a number of claims against Microsoft for infringing various patents. That issue was quietly resolved as a part of this deal. My understanding is that the money that Apple got (for "preferred stock," with no voting rights, which Microsoft subsequently sold for a large profit) was really compensation that the companies agreed to for Apple's claims. But Apple got to spin it as a huge vote of confidence from its biggest competitor (by structuring the deal as an alleged investment), which reassured people that Apple wasn't going out of business anytime soon. Microsoft got two things out of the deal. First, the patent disputes were resolved quietly AND Apple agreed to ship IE as the default browser on the Mac, displacing Netscape. Remember that winning market share was still a HUGE deal for Microsoft at the time. (This was before Safari existed, of course.) BTW, if Apple hadn't had the leverage of patent issues to hold over Microsoft's head, what possible reason would there have been for Microsoft to do the deal? The usual one trotted out is that Microsoft was trying to prop up a competitor to avoid anti-trust issues, but that doesn't make sense, mostly because something like that would have been COMPLETELY at odds with Microsoft's "take no prisoners" approach at the time. So both companies got what they wanted, but there was much more to the story than the simplistic version that you're presenting here. And the part about Office having been gone from the Mac platform was just flat-out wrong in every way.
Posted by: David McElroy 28 Oct 2009
Another Honourable Mention
I would've given a vote to Autoroute 2007. I found it in a shop in Bangkok in 2007 and still find it brilliant. Only now are the GPS systems getting close. It can still design a route with many different waypoints much better than ViaMichelin or the GPS's and running it on an EeePC is great.
Posted by: Harry Cadle 28 Oct 2009
You missed something important!!
You've forgotten Microsoft most important release EVER - The Xbox 360!
Posted by: Richard 28 Oct 2009
Windows Update Number 1 ????????
When an update system is your number one product something is wrong. I mean its not even an application, well not an application in the normal sense of applications. I dont agree with Internet Explorer 7 even being in the list, as its still a massive malware vector which even the police are recommending you dont use to do internet banking with. It also crashes regularly and is very user unfriendly. Anyway youve got guts to expose your fondness for an aggressive monopolistic bully.
Posted by: man o man 28 Oct 2009
only found 1
dos 5 yes, the rest neeeh. MS is product wise such a boring company.
Posted by: Species8472 27 Oct 2009
That's why there is WSUS
"While patching is the aim, the IT staff generally like to test out patches first to make sure they don't crash the system. " That is why there is WSUS. You point your Windows Update to your corporate WSUS server and IT can approve updates on their own schedule while using the auto-install functionality.
Posted by: Scott 26 Oct 2009
No Visual Studio
I would have thought 2008 would be in there somewhere. The de-facto fully integrated development environment.
Posted by: Sym 26 Oct 2009