18 Sep 2006
Long-time Microsoft enemies are taking a positive stance on the vendor's latest pledge not to assert its patent portfolio against a group of 38 web services specifications and their implementations.
The Microsoft Open Specification Promise covers developers and distributors of proprietary and open source applications based on the standards, as well as upcoming web services standards in which Microsoft is participating.
Effectively it means that Microsoft will not charge licence fees or sue developers or distributors for potential patent infringement.
"This is a solid step of disarmament by a firm whose history was not built on sharing," Dan Ravicher, legal director for the Software Freedom Law Center, commented in a blog posting.
"It is also another significant piece of evidence that patent restraints on standards are not good for businesses involved with that standard or the public in general."
The pledge is the first time that Microsoft has made any patent promise concerning open source applications.
The vendor has used strong language in the past to denounce open source, arguing that it "destroys" intellectual property and comparing Linux to a " cancer".
Microsoft explained on its website that it decided to pledge its patents because it wants to assure the popularity of web services standards.
"It was a simple, clear way to reassure a broad audience of developers and customers that the specifications could be used for free, easily, now and forever," Microsoft wrote.
Bob Sutor, vice president of standards and open source at IBM, called the initiative a "nice start", but warned that Microsoft still has to deal with a legacy of opposing open standards.
"The first step was perhaps hard, but they now need to start running fast to catch up to where the industry has been around open operating environments, open middleware, open development environments and so forth," he said.
Simon Phipps, chief open source officer at Sun Microsystems, also welcomed the initiative. "This is what open source needs: freedom from fear of attack," he wrote on his blog.
But Phipps warned that the Microsoft document contains some loopholes that could allow its lawyers to file legal patent claims.
"I assume that Microsoft will look into all of those," Phipps wrote. "Let's hope they go back and apply them in the other areas where we are all in doubt."
Latest stories from Open Source
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
EU data protection overhaul contains "bureaucratic tick box-proposals", says information commissioner Christopher Graham in exclusive interview with V3
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Technical Author - Word, Excel, Visio, Access - Cheltenham...
Java/J2EE Developer - St Albans - £35,000 - £40,000...
Business Analyst – Custody, Cash Management Our...
A fantastic opportunity for an experienced Online Marketing...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
MS is not to be trusted at any point!
These comments "It is heartening to see that Microsoft has softened its line, but we cannot help remaining more than a little cynical. Microsoft has a history of destroying the technology and companies that get in its way. And it usually starts by embracing before it destroys" are so true. Look at DOS for beginners. Every piece of software that was used in Windows in the early days was stolen, reverse-engineered into a poor prodigy of the original, & embedded into the later versions. This created a no need to buy from MS's "newly-created" competitors, although the upshot of their poor prodigies is what we are facing today; poor programming requiring constant patching to protect us from viruses & spyware. This company does exactly what Tom Sanders has stated. They are not to be trusted at any cost. They haven't been buying millions of patents for nothing. MS's true ideology is to seek-out & destroy anything that is not theirs. Look what they did to Java even if it didn't succeed completely. They leave a legacy of second-rate software that is in a terminal state of patch requirement. MS are just using the old adage "keep your friends close & your enemies closer". Open-source is the enemy here & MS have no intention of supporting open-source in any way. They are not to be trusted!
Posted by: Rex Alfie Lee 19 Sep 2006