28 Jan 2009
Storage specialist EMC is keeping an optimistic outlook for 2009, having reported its sixth consecutive year of double-digit growth.
The company announced a 12 per cent rise in revenues in its 2008 fiscal year to $14.88bn (£10.42bn).
EMC also recorded a strong fourth quarter, breaking the $4bn barrier for the first time to log $4.02bn (£2.81bn) in revenues.
However, the fourth quarter was not as profitable for the company as the figures might suggest. A $240m (£168m) bill from restructuring costs pushed total operating income down by 45 per cent over 2007.
The firm hopes to trade the short-term pain for long-term growth, however, and said that the restructuring is expected to yield $350m (£245m) in cost savings in 2009.
EMC predicts that it will be able to outperform the rest of the IT market in the coming year.
"EMC has a firm grasp on what's required to thrive in tough times and emerge even stronger in the next growth cycle," said chief executive and chairman Joe Tucci.
"We have entered 2009 with a robust and diversified business model, which we intend to leverage to extend our technology lead and gain market share."
Latest stories from Storage
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
This role is in the busy technology department within...
We are looking for a Sage Technical Support specialist...
EMEA Cash Equity/Futures Support Manager, Top Tier Bank...
Senior Java Analyst/Developer Skill set: Java, J2SE...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?