14 Jul 2008
US researchers are harnessing digital technology to help differentiate original works of art from forgeries.
Penn State scientists James Z Wang, associate professor of information sciences and technology, and Jia Li, associate professor of statistics, have published their work in the July issue of IEEE Signal Processing.
The team's findings are based on 101 high-resolution greyscale scans of paintings by Vincent van Gogh provided by the Van Gogh and Kröller-Müller museums in the Netherlands.
The scientists broke each scan into sections measuring 512 x 512 pixels, or about 2.5in x 2.5in in canvas size, and analysed the patterns and geometric characteristics of the brush strokes.
From the 101 scans received from the museums, art historians identified 23 as unquestionably authentic van Gogh works. These were used by the computer system as a training database for the artist's brushstroke styles.
Statistical models were created to capture the unique style, or "handwriting ", that became the artist's signature in 23 of the scans.
The other 78 paintings, which were by van Gogh, van Gogh's peers or had at one time been attributed to van Gogh but later found to be unauthentic, were compared against the generated models to test the algorithms.
Latest stories from Software
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Principal Development Engineer Lead- London - Smart TV...
Development Engineer - London - Smart TV, Gaming, Tablets...
Principal Development Engineer - London - Smart TV, Gaming...
Test Engineer -London - Smart TV, Gaming, Tablets, PC...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Technology proves the truths, but the so-called experts still tell their MFA lies.
Yes,.... this crap they are saying tells us says absolutely nothing about which are the fakes and which ones that are not. They know,... but would just a soon leave things the way that they are. Why even think about destroying a six to eight billion dollar a year thieving ass business?
Posted by: Bob 23 May 2009
Technology proves the truths, but the so-called eperts still tell their MFA lies.
Yes,.... this crap that they are saying and telling us says absolutely nothing about which are the fakes and which ones that are not. They know,... but would just a soon leave things the way that they are. Why even think about destroying a six to eight billion dollar a year thieving ass business?
Posted by: Bob 23 May 2009
Mis-information?
This news item does not indicate that technology detected any fake works of art, merely that art historians did so. In fact, the report does not mention the outcome of the statistical analysis, which seems pretty pointless. At best one could say that we may have the technology to detect fake works of art, but it has not yet been proven.
Posted by: Jeffrey Ross 17 Jul 2008