06 Dec 2005
The open source Xen project has released version 3.0 of its virtualisation software.
The new version brings the application within reach of large enterprises, according to the suite's developers, by offering increased performance and support for large server memory configurations of up to 4GB for 32-bit systems and 1TB for 64-bit servers.
Xen enables enterprise users to cut a single physical server into 32 virtual machines that each behave as an individual system.
Running applications on virtual machines offers potential savings on hardware and maintenance costs while maintaining the security and stability of a dedicated server.
Xen was developed at the University of Cambridge with support from Intel, and competes with proprietary applications providers including VMWare.
The new software also hooks into Intel's Virtualization Technology introduced earlier this year in its Xeon and Pentium processors.
The chip feature offers better performance for virtual machines. Support for a similar technology from AMD called Pacifica is slated for release in early 2006.
Xen 3.0 is available for Red Hat, SuSE Linux and Solaris 10.
Latest stories from Open Source
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Project Manager - Credit Risk - Finance IT - Investment...
Infrastructure Configuration Manager/Analyst/Data Modeler...
Lead Perl Developer, Apache, SQL, Unix/Linux, Shell Scripting...
**Perl /Java Developer, Web/ JEE application servers...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?