04 Oct 2010
Oracle seems in no hurry to reunite the OpenOffice.org productivity application suite brand with the community that has developed it over the past 10 years, it emerged this weekend.
The open source community behind OpenOffice last week broke away from the brand and organisation that Oracle acquired with Sun 18 months ago.
The new, independent Document Foundation that emerged immediately received the support of almost the entire OpenOffice programming community, including Novell, Red Hat and Google.
Conspicuous by its absence, Oracle however appears to be in no rush to curry favour with the new foundation, nor donate the OpenOffice brand or software, according to its response to a V3.co.uk request for comment late last week.
Oracle said it was investing substantial resources in OpenOffice.org.
“With more than 100 million users, we believe OpenOffice.org is the most advanced, most feature-rich open-source implementation and will strongly encourage the OpenOffice community to continue to contribute through www.openoffice.org,” the enterprise software and hardware giant said in a statement.
The newly formed foundation had invited Oracle to join its organisation and donate the OpenOffice brand. The foundation said it would use the new " LibreOffice" brand for its software development efforts in the meantime.
But Oracle said, “The beauty of open source is that it can be forked by anyone who chooses, as was done [by The Document Foundation]. Our sincerest goal for OpenOffice is that it becomes more widely used so, if this new foundation will help advance OpenOffice and the Open Document Format (ODF), we wish them the best.”
Florian Effenberger, steering committee member at The Document Foundation, confirmed to V3.co.uk that the OpenOffice.org trademark belongs to Oracle. “And we as the community have shaped this brand for the last 10 years,” he added.
In spite of the apparent rebuff of Oracle’s statement, he restated: “We hope Oracle will join the foundation and also donate these assets to it, so we can continue using the name OpenOffice.org.”
Effenberger added: “As of today, we have no final decision by Oracle yet – neither with regards to being a part of the foundation, nor with regards to the donation of the assets.”
Effenberger was keen to highlight the huge amounts of positive feedback on the creation of The Document Foundation, which “confirms that the major step we've taken was right”, he said.
“We're very confident that it will shift not only the community, but also the software to a new and important level,” he added.
Bob Tarzey, director of analyst firm Quocirca, questioned whether Oracle and the OpenOffice brand should be so important to the breakaway community. “There are multiple projects working on the underlying project anyway,” he said.
“Some will support commercial Linux distributions, like Ubuntu, openSUSE and Red Hat, and in a way, Oracle has every right to the same. It could’ve used this opportunity [The Document Foundation’s invitation] to show its open-source commitment. But it doesn’t have to,” he added.
Latest stories from Developer
Related videos
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Lead PHP Developer - Technical Architect - Ecommerce...
C# Software Engineers required to join rapidly expanding...
Java / J2EE Software Engineers required to join rapidly...
Developer (MIS / Business Systems - SQL / T-SQL, HTML...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Oracle can't benefit for LibreOffice code
One of the main reasons to create LibreOffice was the agreement contributors have to sign to get contributions within OpenOffice.org which gave Oracle (earlier Sun) all the rights so they could release closed sourced office suites aswell. As far as I know LibreOffice release everything under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) which is true Open Source. So Oracle can't use any of the software from LibreOffice and implement it in OpenOffice.org or in an close sourced office suite. And by the way - forking is not one of the best things of Open Source software - only when a project is abonded. The most enjoyable greetings Claus Agerskov
Posted by: Claus Agerskov 09 Oct 2010
The Evil One Cometh
God help us if Oracle really do try to buy up AMD as well. Jeeze they really are doing a good job of making me think their intentions are based on pure corporate greed and evil-wrong-do-doings...
Posted by: Bob 09 Oct 2010
We believe in truth, justice...
...and the American way. We'll lie & cheat our way to furnish our earnings the way Microsux has shown us all. We believe in Open Source as long as we control it. Another suck-hole organisation that will kill OSS if they can.
Posted by: Rex Alfie Lee 06 Oct 2010