26 Oct 2010

The government's plans to store UK citizens' emails and internet history have been criticised by the Information Commissioner as going too far.
The Strategic Defence and Security Review, published last week, includes plans to force ISPs, and potentially all companies, to store email and internet data for at least one year.
However, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) is less sure of the need of the new rules, and has suggested that the precautions have over-stated the risk and potential benefits.
"The Commissioner [Christopher Graham's] view on the proposed interception modernisation programme remains as set out in his consultation response," said the ICO in a statement.
"His key concern is whether the case has been made for the project. On the face of it, the proposal seems disproportionate when any perceived benefits that might be gained from retaining this data are set against the risks to privacy."
Downing Street said that such a move is necessary for UK security, and will "preserve the ability of the security, intelligence and law enforcement agencies to obtain communication data and to intercept communications". The review explained that such information could be used as evidence in court when the government is looking to prosecute those engaged in crimes such as terrorism.
"Communications data provides evidence in court to secure convictions of those engaged in activities that cause serious harm," noted the review.
"It has played a role in every major Security Service counterterrorism operation, and in 95 per cent of all serious organised crime investigations."
The ICO first raised concerns about the government's plans in a response to a consultation by the Home Office in July, and will meet with ministers to discuss whether any changes to the plans are necessary.
"The Information Commissioner looks forward to meeting with officials at the Home Office to establish whether or not his concerns have been addressed," the ICO added.
Latest stories from Government
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
About Us WorldPay provides a globally connected, locally...
About Us WorldPay provides a globally connected, locally...
SQL Server Developer - Our client, an international...
IT Technical Service Delivery Manager / ITIL / Reigate...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
A forest of trees
I sent an email to my sister today regarding a forthcoming birthday, but I cannot see how the UK's interests will benefit by keeping that email for a year let alone one minute. Of all the users of the internet, only a small fraction will be interested in trying to overthrow or injure the State. Therefore it would seem a far better use of limited resources to target only those suspected individuals and go for surveillance in depth. One wonders too how secure will be all the information that is collected; will it not be mislaid in the post or on a train?
Posted by: Michael 28 Oct 2010