28 Oct 2010
BT has attacked the pricing of Virgin Media's 100Mbit/s broadband packages less than 24 hours after they were announced, as the battle between ISPs to roll out high-speed internet throughout the UK continues.
Virgin Media is taking pre-orders for 100Mbit/s packages starting at £35 for customers who purchase a bundle of services, or £45 for those opting just for broadband.
BT said in a statement that all superfast broadband is good for the UK, but questioned Virgin Media's pricing for the service.
"BT is already rolling out fibre broadband to approximately 17 million homes and businesses, and it is good for UK plc that there will be another high-speed network, albeit one that is isn't open to other companies in the way BT's is," the statement said.
"Take up is as important as availability, however, and we would question why Virgin is charging such a premium. Its new service is more than twice the price of BT's fibre product, so we are surprised by the high price when most family budgets are tight."
Rob Bamforth, principal analyst at Quocirca, maintained that sniping between the two companies does neither any favours, and that BT can be criticised for many things, including the speed with which it opened up its network assets.
"The key for business and individual broadband users is that there is competition between significant carriers with national infrastructure," he said.
"Take up and price are both important, but vary based on the ebb and flow of the market, and availability claims must be checked for their reach."
Bamforth added that businesses are becoming more distributed, and need high-speed connections everywhere.
"The reality for many in remote or rural locations will be a much slower experience, he said.
BT was recently forced by Ofcom to give other ISPs access to its fibre network, underground ducts and telegraph poles to help drive the deployment of superfast broadband.
Latest stories from Networks
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
IT Support Analyst (initial 6 month fixed term) Cirencester...
Java Developer - Graduate / Budding Superstar opportunity...
Solution Consultant - JEE, Support, Project Lead, SQL...
C++ Developer - C++, STL, Boost, Delphi, Concurrency...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Sour Grapes
i agree BT are just sour about the situation. Iused to work for them and always dreaded talking about the unforseen additional charges when it comes to lines, installatuions etc. I think BT just need to shut up and admit that Virgin have beat them to the post.
Posted by: Liam 29 Oct 2010
virgin who...
Yes but then again Virgin media would be um..nowhere without BT it`s only because BT is forced to open up to everything that Virgin Media can do...anything. In other words VM would be flicked out the way without effort by BT if they wasn`t tied down. Like VM are asking to use BT new fibre... pathetic. Obviously lower because they beg to use BT telephone exchanges without the overheads.
Posted by: Steve Smith 29 Oct 2010
BT can't argue about price
BT cannot argue about a high price. It also forgets to mention that even though its broadband may be cheaper it: a. requires you pay for a telephone line adding at least another £12 a month b. Is significantly slower than Virgin broadband c. cannot match the 100Mbps claim and probably won't be able to for years So please BT, just shut up. Your service is far more expensive than Virgins when put in perspective.
Posted by: Matthew 28 Oct 2010