07 Mar 2006
Microsoft claimed a "patenting milestone" today after having its 5,000th application granted in the US.
Patent number 6,999,083 provides for technologies that allow people not just to play video games against each other online, but to join the game as a spectator from any location.
The patent, which covers technologies to be featured in Xbox 360 games, allows consumers to tune into a video game much as they would a sporting event.
"The 5,000th patent is a marker of the progress we have made in the past few years," said Brad Smith, senior vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary at Microsoft.
"Through patents, we are able to license our technologies widely to others in the industry."
Microsoft said that it has used its expanding intellectual property portfolio to launch development-seeding licensing initiatives, including IP Ventures, a programme dedicated to bringing technology to emerging businesses.
The software giant has also entered into licensing agreements with a wide variety of companies including Autodesk, Inrix, Motorola, Palm, SAP, Softedge-Systems, Sony Ericsson, Sun Microsystems, Symbian and Turbolinux.
Microsoft claimed that it will "continue to strive toward its goal of filing for 3,000 patents per year".
The National Research Council of the National Academies noted that this level is consistent with the average for IT companies in filing about two patents for every $1m spent on research and development.
Since its public commitment to patent and intellectual property licensing in December 2003, Microsoft has been playing catch up with other long-time patent licensors such as IBM, which boasts a portfolio of over 25,000 US patents.
The most recent patent scorecard published by IpIQ (formerly published by Technology Review), ranks Microsoft in the top 10.
Latest stories from Software
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Support Engineer - Cisco - LINUX - ISP - NOC - £30-40k...
Netapp Storage Engineer - NCDA - NCIE - Unix/ Linux Skills...
Cisco ISP Pre-sales consultant - CCNA - CCNP - CCIE...
Netapp Storage Engineer - NCDA - NCIE - Unix/ Linux Skills...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Patents maiming
Personally I think patents like this should not be granted. Companies are patenting technologies they did not invent; they take existing technologies that have existed in the developers community, make very minor contributions and then patent entire sections of it. "Spectator" views in online games have been around for many years. Just look at Quake 3 which contains online spectator modes, virtual camera views, camera views from players perspectives, lists of active games with details of who is playing, etc, etc. It is shocking to think that any software of merit written today will break numerous patents. Patents for functionality the patent owner did not invent. Technology which most developers see as given creativity and would not think to patent. There is always the ?prior art? case but there shouldn?t need to be. This is just another example of organisations with too much money securing future development and preventing others from being creative, patenting anything that moves.
Posted by: Gavin 07 Mar 2006
Perpetual Motion Device
Can I patent the US Patent Office as the first working example of a perpetual motion device ?
Posted by: Sean McHugh 07 Mar 2006