13 May 2009
A vote on Tuesday by the French National Assembly to restrict file sharers' and illegal downloaders' internet access has given hope to copyright pressure groups across the Channel that similar measures will soon be adopted in the UK.
The assembly passed the bill by 296 to 233 after the European Parliament rejected the idea last week. The bill will mean that individuals involved in copyright infringement online will be banned from using the internet for up to a year if they are third-time offenders.
Although the bill still needs to be accepted by the French Senate and the Constitutional Council, citizen rights groups, such as La Quadrature du Net, have warned that French president Nicolas Sarkozy's determination to see the proposals passed is going to be difficult to overcome.
Sarkozy pressed ahead with the idea, although the EU is still in disagreement over the policy. The Tuesday vote was also the second time that the French Assembly was called to vote on the same proposal, following the second round of voting by the European Parliament to decide on the measures. In parliament's case, there remained an overwhelming opposition to the plans.
In February 2008, there were reports that the UK government's Department for Culture, Media and Sport was considering a similar 'three strikes' proposal put forward by the music and recording industry, although nothing has come of it.
The UK Intellectual Property Office has since argued that any UK policy that comes into force to protect copyright will be agreed by both industry bodies, including internet service providers and entertainment organisations, and relevant government departments. However, the government's exact stance on the issue will be laid out in next month's Digital Britain report.
In March, the government added to the proposals outlined in the report with a plan for a Digital Rights Agency that would raise public awareness around copyright issues and take charge of enforcement measures.
But ahead of the report's publication, UK copyright groups are demanding fierce regulation for copyright infringement spurred on by the French decision yesterday.
"The UK approach should differ in detail to what has been proposed by the French, but what we need is concrete action," said Richard Mollet, public affairs director at industry trade association the British Phonographic Industry (BPI) in response to the Tuesday vote.
Mollet expressed hope that the European Union's conciliation phase would see the European Parliament's decision on the copyright measures sidelined. The conciliation phase is when Parliament and the Council try to reach a compromise.
Meanwhile, BPI chief executive Geoff Taylor called on the government to use the time available in this parliament to introduce legislation requiring ISPs to act against persistent illegal downloaders.
"An endless free lunch for consumers when it comes to digital content is unsustainable," Taylor said on Tuesday at a joint meeting of the Federation of Entertainment Unions, the UK Film Council and BAFTA on the future of the creative industries.
"Unless ministers strengthen proposals for ISPs to deal with illegal behaviour online, a 'creative crunch' will follow and investment in new British talent will ultimately dry up."
Taylor's calls were followed by a joint statement by the BPI, the Federation Against Copyright Theft and the National Union of Journalists, asking the government to take action against illegal dowloaders. The statement was issued at a conference in London called The Future of the Creative Economy.
But the Internet Services Providers' Association (ISPA) is disappointed that the creative industries continue to advocate legislation on enforcement without considering other means by which consumers can be provided with the content legally.
"It is our view that legislation on enforcement should only be introduced on the condition that the rights holder industry commits to significant licensing reform," said ISPA in a statement on Wednesday.
"ISPA continues to dispute calls from some elements of the creative industries for the disconnection of users or technological measures as a method of dealing with potential infringers of copyright online.
"ISPA members have consistently explained that significant technological advances would be required if these measures are to reach a standard where they would be admissible as evidence in court."
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Java Developer - Belfast - Banking Skills: Core Java...
I am recruiting for a Shared Accounting Service Manager...
QA Tester/Automation Tester - C# .NET Agile, Epsom, Surrey...
3RD LINE EXCHANGE 2010 / 2003, QUEST, LONDON, GLOBAL...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
all media download free - charge a little extra for the internet connection
basically - lets have all the stuff for free but pay for the "connection" revenue from ads & "connection" to copyright holders the tv is going online soon anyway is TV license going to be applciable to laptops - it never will so there fore get revenue from source in turn BT - govement regulated anyway lets call it an "Internet Fuel Surcharge"
Posted by: the messiah 01 Jun 2009
wtf!!
This is ridiculous! i agree that illegal downloading should be better watched but a simple file share...when people are on msn etc. and see a song being listened to by a friend they ask it to be sent to them...if copy writters have a problem with that then they should come up with something to stop the files being sent not ban people from the internet!! surely artists should be pleased that people want to listen to their song...i think the government should be concentrating on something a little more important such as the state of hospitals or how about the recession? they are taking things to far and taking away our freedom to listen to what music we want to listen to! the government are never going to be able to stop people file sharing...ever! They may be able to ban people from using the internet, but how about people that copy CD's or film etc!! its stupid they need to straighten out their priorities!! (sorry about the rant)!!
Posted by: Helen 14 May 2009