21 Apr 2006
The US government is seeking to adopt new legislation that will increase fines for providers who knowingly fail to report child pornography on their networks.
The new law also seeks to make it more difficult to inadvertently stumble on pornographic images while surfing the web.
"Sadly, the internet age has created a vicious cycle in which child pornography continually becomes more widespread, more graphic, and more sadistic, using younger and younger children," said US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales in a speech at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
The new legislation proposes fines of $150,000 for service providers which knowingly fail to report child pornography on their networks, and a $300,000 fine for each additional violation.
It also seeks to force porn sites to present visitors with a welcome page devoid of any sexually explicit images to prevent unwanted exposure.
Gonzales said that he will engage with service providers to persuade them to retain log files and allow them to be used in investigations and as evidence in child pornography cases.
But the attorney general admitted that such a request could be at odds with privacy rights.
The two new proposals will be added as an amendment to the Children's Safety and Violent Crime Reduction Act which is currently awaiting approval by the Senate.
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
IT Support Analyst (initial 6 month fixed term) Cirencester...
Java Developer - Graduate / Budding Superstar opportunity...
Solution Consultant - JEE, Support, Project Lead, SQL...
C++ Developer - C++, STL, Boost, Delphi, Concurrency...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Catch 22 ?
So the government: A. wants to have child pornography eliminated, thats good. B. wants porn sites to log vistors of "legal" adult sites for evidence in child porn cases... Anyone else see the conflicting reasoning? How are logs of legal site going to help? Illegal sites most certainly would not keep logs as they would only help prove that they were providing illegal content....
Posted by: Catch 22 16 Jun 2006