All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis

DoJ defends Microsoft settlement

by John Geralds in Silicon Valley

07 Mar 2002

Be the first to comment

  • Tweet this

The US Department of Justice (DoJ) defended the terms of its antitrust settlement with Microsoft to a federal judge in the hope of gaining an endorsement.

The move was made despite objections from the nine states seeking harsher sanctions against the company.

DoJ attorney Philip Beck told US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly that a federal appeals court fundamentally narrowed the scope of Microsoft's wrongdoing, which made it difficult for the government to seek stronger penalties.

"Getting more would have been an uphill battle that was likely to have been resolved against us," said Beck. "We tried very hard the first time around and we were not able to do it."

Meanwhile, Microsoft lawyer John Warden said that the company accepted a settlement that "not only addresses the acts identified by the courts as illegal, but is far broader".

He explained that additional provisions, such as disclosing software code to link computers that run corporate networks with handheld devices, were accepted as "the price of the settlement".

Warden claimed that the settlement was in the best interests of all involved, and said it would reduce costs and strains on Microsoft in ending the four-year case.

Judge Kollar-Kotelly asked the government to clarify several elements of the settlement which she said were vague, and questioned whether all the proper disclosures had been made to the court.

The judge, who is holding two days of hearings on the proposed settlement, stated that it was not likely that she would make a ruling in the immediate future. "I have a lot of work ahead of me before I make this decision," she said.

As they now stand, the settlement terms prevent Microsoft from retaliating against computer makers for using non-Microsoft products, and insist on a uniform licence price for Windows.

The settlement also requires the company to disclose the inner workings of some of its software to third-party software makers, and makes it easier for consumers to remove some Windows features, such as the Internet Explorer browser.

Microsoft reached the settlement deal with the DoJ in November when nine of the 18 states in the lawsuit agreed to the conditions.

Do you agree?

 

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions. Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Poll

Flame virus poll

Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?

35%

0%

11%

54%

Connect with V3.co.uk

Sign up to our daily or weekly newsletters

Symanteccloud

Social networking: a guide for IT managers

Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them

Riverbed

Mitigating the risks of IT change

The importance of understanding your infrastructure

Business Readiness/ Change manager

As part of a major implementation of a new inventory...

Information/Data Architect - MDM - SOA

Information/Data Architect - MDM - Master Data Management...

Softwaren Developer - .Net/SQL Server

Code Red Associates (CRA) is a leading supplier of Permanent...

Senior Test Analyst, Quality Assurance, QA, To £47,000 + Benefits

A fantastic opportunity has arisen for an experienced...

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.