08 Oct 2009
Systems experts with stop watches have poured cold water on Microsoft's claims that its Windows 7 operating system boots up faster than Vista.
Redmond has been marketing Windows 7 on the claim that it can boot up quicker than Vista.
However, Iolo Technologies, which sells PC tune-up software called System Mechanic, said that Windows 7 takes one minute and 34 seconds to become usable, whereas Vista takes only one minute and six seconds.
Iolo explained that most measurements were based on the time it took the desktop to appear. In Windows 7 this is much faster and can be about 40 seconds, but Windows 7 is not actually completely usable at that point.
The company decided to trip its stop watches on the time it takes Windows 7 to become fully usable "with CPU cycles no longer significantly high and a true idle state achieved".
Windows gets slower and slower as time goes on, Iolo added. The firm found that a three-month old machine can take up to a minute longer to boot, or two minutes and 34 seconds.
Windows 7 did outperform Vista at the three-month and six-month marks. But it "trailed the older version significantly" in its earlier boot-up tests.
Iolo plans to release more details on its findings and methodology next week.
Latest stories from Operating Systems
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Inside Sales / IT Sales / Business Development / Fluent...
Title: Senior Web Developer / Engineer (HTML, JavaScript...
Job Title: Java Developer (J2SE / JEE) Salary: up to...
Job Title: Agile Test Manager Salary: up to 55k per...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
OS
Personally I used to be a massive MS fan, but all of this rubbish on how fast OS's start and arguments over MS Office and all the rest of it and the pure cost of hardware to run Windows nowadays has converted me ad no more am I an MS fan, I think it is a better option to run Linux you also have no cost of licensing. The Linux OS is fast, reliable and comes with everything. And you can still even today run it on an old 166 with 16 MB of Ram and it wil still be fast! Try it, Try Linux there's hundreds of diffrent versions you may find one to suit your needs! There is also no need for Malicious file software such as Viruses there is no such thing to Linux.
Posted by: Paul 09 Oct 2009