All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis

PubPat seeks to invalidate EpicRealm patents

by Tom Sanders in California

23 Nov 2006

Be the first to comment

  • Tweet this
Website URL
EpicRealm patents cover the way in which dynamic web pages are served

The Public Patent Foundation has filed a formal request with the US Patent and Trademark Office to re-examine two patents held by EpicRealm. The procedure could cause the patents to be invalidated. 

The disputed patents (5,894,554 and 6,415,335) cover a technology to build dynamic web pages. If broadly applied, they would cover a large group of corporate websites. 

The Public Patent Foundation describes itself as a not-for-profit group that aims to protect the public from the "harms caused by the patent system" by seeking to invalidate patents which it believes have been wrongly awarded.

Dan Ravicher, the group's executive director, told vnunet.com that IBM's 5,701,415 patent is "exactly the same" as the EpicRealm patents.

The IBM patent preceded EpicRealm's by 16 months. "This is one of the strongest cases I've ever had," he said. 

Ravicher added that the foundation decided to dispute the patent because E picRealm has been aggressively seeking royalty payments, and had filed its lawsuits in Eastern Texas where the courts have traditionally been favourable towards patent holders in legal disputes.

EpicRealm used to operate as a web acceleration firm during the dotcom boom and stopped marketing its products about three years ago. Last year it started to seek royalty payments for its patents

The firm filed 13 lawsuits against website operators last year, including eHarmony, FriendFinder, Herbalife and Safelite. Five of these, including the cases against eHarmony and Safelite, have since been settled. 

Oracle and QuinStreet filed legal claims against EpicRealm last summer, charging that the company's patents are invalid.

Although neither company is directly targeted by the lawsuits, they supply software that delivers dynamic web pages. 

Oracle and QuinStreet are required to indemnify their customers under the terms of their licence agreements. Oracle has been forced to do so by Safelite, and QuinStreet by Herbalife.

Most parties opposing EpicRealm have charged that the company's patents are invalid. The Public Patent Foundation, however, is the first to ask the Patent Office to re-examine the patent.

The Patent Office will decide whether it will do so within three months. The actual re-examination procedure can take several years.

A lawyer representing EpicRealm did not return a phone call seeking comment.

Do you agree?

 

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions. Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Poll

IT priorities for 2012

What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?

99%

0%

1%

0%

0%

Connect with V3.co.uk

Sign up to our daily or weekly newsletters

Accurev

Top 5 software development challenges

This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes

Talend

Rubbish in, rubbish enterprise

Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)

Onsite IT Support Technician Manager - Leek - circa £25,000

Onsite IT Support Technician / Manager - Leek - circa...

Lead Infrastructure Engineer (Microsoft) – Hosted Services

Lead Infrastructure Engineer (Microsoft) – Hosted Services...

Business Analyst

Hi Greetings, Job Title : Business Analyst Location...

Magento Senior Developer

Magento Senior Developer, London : Magento / PHP / CSS...

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.