06 Oct 2003
Microsoft has released a critical security patch for Internet Explorer.
Covering all versions of the browser since 5.01, the new patch corrects a series of flaws, including one that would allow hackers to run code on machines using a pop-up web page.
All the patches relate to the specific problem of hackers designing web pages that can subvert a PC without the need for users to open any attachments or malware.
For example, one of the holes allows hackers to conceal malware in a pop-up window.
Unpatched versions of Internet Explorer do not properly examine data sent when a web page requests a pop-up window from its own server, which means that malware could be inserted.
There is also a problem with the way Internet Explorer handles XML data binding. XML is used to attach data to specific points on a web page, which could then be pushed onto users' PCs.
Users are also vulnerable to these problems if they receive a specially crafted email from hackers. The patch strengthens the browser's protection against such dynamic HTML emails that can run scripts automatically.
More details and the patch can be found here.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Credit Risk Modeller, SAS, London, £50,000 Title- Credit...
My London client is looking for an experienced Programme...
My leading client is looking for a number of excellent...
My client, a leading international name in Manufacturing...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?