14 Mar 2007
UK online banking fraud leapt 44 per cent in 2006 following a rise in the number of phishing attacks, according to figures released today.
Apacs, the UK payments association, found that online banking fraud increased from £23.2m in 2005 to £33.5m in 2006.
"It is clear that phishing scams are one of the primary attack methods used by cyber-criminals and the Apacs figures put this into startling reality," said Greg Day, senior security analyst at McAfee.
Day said that, as users became more aware of these attacks, cyber-criminals are more likely to target smaller institutions using more advanced methods.
The figures also show that chip and Pin has reduced the amount of face-to-face fraud at UK retailers by 47 per cent since 2005. However, this reduction has forced fraudulent activity abroad or onto the internet.
Illegal transactions overseas amounted to £118.2m in 2006, a rise of 43 per cent over 2005.
Card-not-present fraud carried out over the internet or telephone increased by 16 per cent to £212.6m in 2006, making up just under half of all card fraud losses.
"Chip and Pin has had a hugely positive effect on fraud losses over the counter in UK shops and stores," said Sandra Quinn, director of communications at Apacs.
"But we are seeing more fraud on transactions that do not use chip and Pin, such as over the internet and phone, by mail order and abroad in countries that have not yet fully upgraded to chip and Pin."
Day maintained that it is important for businesses to consider the potential impact that online and phishing attacks could have on their credentials.
"Phishing is not just targeted at consumers, and this type of online scam can be adapted to steal more than bank details, with the value of intellectual business property increasing," he said.
"Businesses must ensure that they have the appropriate technology and processes in place to protect their employees and their own reputation."
Quinn added that the fight against fraud will not succeed with a single-layer approach and will only improve when public and private bodies work together.
"That includes developing and implementing strategies, sharing best practice and, most importantly, sharing data," she said.
"We need government intervention to remove the current barriers to this and we welcome improvements proposed in the Fraud Review and the Serious Crime Bill. "
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Credit Risk Modeller, SAS, London, £50,000 Title- Credit...
My London client is looking for an experienced Programme...
My leading client is looking for a number of excellent...
My client, a leading international name in Manufacturing...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Use bookmarks and you won't get phished
If the banks and other financial organizations repeatedly indoctrinate their customers to set up bookmarks and only use book marks (no emil, web or instant messager links) to access web sites where they condct financial transactions, the customers will not get phished. The banks and the security industry are so focused on fake email and fake web sites, that they are not telling customers how to ensure they reach the real site - all the time.
Posted by: Howard Mirkin 15 Mar 2007
Reasons why fraud crimes are booming.
Fraud will continue to grow until ID KEY (memory stick) system is implemented which will make both signature and PIN number systems reliable as follows. ID KEY will activate printer to print ID sticker (small sticker with person's image and name printed on it) which can be attached to the document and countersigned to personalise signature. Why would anyone get tempted to misuse this system when they know that in the event of crime we will know who they are? ATM would be activated by personalised Card Key Code stored in ID KEY, Why would anyone get tempted to use stolen or skimmed cards when they know that ATM will not get activated without use of ID KEY? From these details it is obvious why rather than combating other systems will only divert fraud to other sectors
Posted by: Yogesh Raja 14 Mar 2007